Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract Background and Aims Accelerometers collect data in an objective way, however, a number of decisions must be done during data collection, processing and output‐interpretation. The influence of those decisions is seldom investigated, reported, or discussed. Herein, we examined the influence o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helén Eke, Stephanie E. Bonn, Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1810
_version_ 1797331736646909952
author Helén Eke
Stephanie E. Bonn
Ylva Trolle Lagerros
author_facet Helén Eke
Stephanie E. Bonn
Ylva Trolle Lagerros
author_sort Helén Eke
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims Accelerometers collect data in an objective way, however, a number of decisions must be done during data collection, processing and output‐interpretation. The influence of those decisions is seldom investigated, reported, or discussed. Herein, we examined the influence of different decisions on the outcomes: daily minutes of moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA), inactivity and light physical activity (LPA). Methods In total, 156 participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X‐BT) on their nondominant wrist for 7 days. Data collection was conducted from February 2017 to June 2018. Data was processed using the R‐package GGIR and default settings were compared to by‐the‐literature‐suggested options. The output was examined using paired t‐tests. Results When comparing two commonly used MVPA‐cut‐points, default and Hildebrand et al. we found a marginal difference (0.4 min, 1.0%, p < 0.001) in MVPA/day. When no bout criteria for MVPA/day was applied, MVPA/day was twice as high as bouted MVPA/day. Further, when we changed the epoch‐length from 5 to 1 s, statistically significant changes were seen for MVPA/day (−6.6 min, 19%, p < 0.001), inactivity/day (−22 min, 3.0%, p < 0.001) and LPA/day (28 min, 81%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Decisions made during data processing of wrist‐worn accelerometers has an influence on the output and thus, may influence the conclusions drawn. However, there may be situations when these settings are changed. If so, we recommend examining if the variables of interest are affected. We encourage researchers to report decisions made during data collection, processing and output‐interpretation, to facilitate comparisons between different studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:38:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe1d45537164414895e4c55ecdf8ab4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:38:41Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-fe1d45537164414895e4c55ecdf8ab4e2024-02-02T18:04:59ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352024-01-0171n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1810Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional studyHelén Eke0Stephanie E. Bonn1Ylva Trolle Lagerros2Department of Medicine (Solna) Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Medicine (Solna) Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Medicine (Solna) Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenAbstract Background and Aims Accelerometers collect data in an objective way, however, a number of decisions must be done during data collection, processing and output‐interpretation. The influence of those decisions is seldom investigated, reported, or discussed. Herein, we examined the influence of different decisions on the outcomes: daily minutes of moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA), inactivity and light physical activity (LPA). Methods In total, 156 participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X‐BT) on their nondominant wrist for 7 days. Data collection was conducted from February 2017 to June 2018. Data was processed using the R‐package GGIR and default settings were compared to by‐the‐literature‐suggested options. The output was examined using paired t‐tests. Results When comparing two commonly used MVPA‐cut‐points, default and Hildebrand et al. we found a marginal difference (0.4 min, 1.0%, p < 0.001) in MVPA/day. When no bout criteria for MVPA/day was applied, MVPA/day was twice as high as bouted MVPA/day. Further, when we changed the epoch‐length from 5 to 1 s, statistically significant changes were seen for MVPA/day (−6.6 min, 19%, p < 0.001), inactivity/day (−22 min, 3.0%, p < 0.001) and LPA/day (28 min, 81%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Decisions made during data processing of wrist‐worn accelerometers has an influence on the output and thus, may influence the conclusions drawn. However, there may be situations when these settings are changed. If so, we recommend examining if the variables of interest are affected. We encourage researchers to report decisions made during data collection, processing and output‐interpretation, to facilitate comparisons between different studies.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1810accelerometryactiGraphGGIRmethodsphysical activitysedentary behavior
spellingShingle Helén Eke
Stephanie E. Bonn
Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
Health Science Reports
accelerometry
actiGraph
GGIR
methods
physical activity
sedentary behavior
title Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Wrist‐worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort wrist worn accelerometers influence of decisions during data collection and processing a cross sectional study
topic accelerometry
actiGraph
GGIR
methods
physical activity
sedentary behavior
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1810
work_keys_str_mv AT heleneke wristwornaccelerometersinfluenceofdecisionsduringdatacollectionandprocessingacrosssectionalstudy
AT stephanieebonn wristwornaccelerometersinfluenceofdecisionsduringdatacollectionandprocessingacrosssectionalstudy
AT ylvatrollelagerros wristwornaccelerometersinfluenceofdecisionsduringdatacollectionandprocessingacrosssectionalstudy