Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission

Summary: Superspreaders are recognized as being important drivers of disease spread. However, models to date have assumed random occurrence of superspreaders, irrespective of whom they were infected by. Evidence suggests though that those individuals infected by superspreaders may be more likely to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klara M. Wanelik, Mike Begon, Andy Fenton, Rachel A. Norman, Pablo M. Beldomenico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223006958
_version_ 1797842480615391232
author Klara M. Wanelik
Mike Begon
Andy Fenton
Rachel A. Norman
Pablo M. Beldomenico
author_facet Klara M. Wanelik
Mike Begon
Andy Fenton
Rachel A. Norman
Pablo M. Beldomenico
author_sort Klara M. Wanelik
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Superspreaders are recognized as being important drivers of disease spread. However, models to date have assumed random occurrence of superspreaders, irrespective of whom they were infected by. Evidence suggests though that those individuals infected by superspreaders may be more likely to become superspreaders themselves. Here, we begin to explore, theoretically, the effects of such a positive feedback loop on (1) the final epidemic size, (2) the herd immunity threshold, (3) the basic reproduction number, R0, and (4) the peak prevalence of superspreaders, using a generic model (for a hypothetical acute viral infection) and illustrative parameter values. We show that positive feedback loops can have a profound effect on our chosen epidemic outcomes, even when the transmission advantage of superspreaders is moderate, and despite peak prevalence of superspreaders remaining low. We argue that positive superspreader feedback loops in different infectious diseases, including SARS-CoV-2, should be investigated further, both theoretically and empirically.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:48:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe1e29e9b89c4cb4bf39373ede605d01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-0042
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:48:36Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series iScience
spelling doaj.art-fe1e29e9b89c4cb4bf39373ede605d012023-04-22T06:22:19ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422023-05-01265106618Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmissionKlara M. Wanelik0Mike Begon1Andy Fenton2Rachel A. Norman3Pablo M. Beldomenico4Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Corresponding authorDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UKDepartment of Computing Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UKLaboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Universidad Nacional del Litoral), Esperanza, ArgentinaSummary: Superspreaders are recognized as being important drivers of disease spread. However, models to date have assumed random occurrence of superspreaders, irrespective of whom they were infected by. Evidence suggests though that those individuals infected by superspreaders may be more likely to become superspreaders themselves. Here, we begin to explore, theoretically, the effects of such a positive feedback loop on (1) the final epidemic size, (2) the herd immunity threshold, (3) the basic reproduction number, R0, and (4) the peak prevalence of superspreaders, using a generic model (for a hypothetical acute viral infection) and illustrative parameter values. We show that positive feedback loops can have a profound effect on our chosen epidemic outcomes, even when the transmission advantage of superspreaders is moderate, and despite peak prevalence of superspreaders remaining low. We argue that positive superspreader feedback loops in different infectious diseases, including SARS-CoV-2, should be investigated further, both theoretically and empirically.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223006958Health sciencesMedicineVirology
spellingShingle Klara M. Wanelik
Mike Begon
Andy Fenton
Rachel A. Norman
Pablo M. Beldomenico
Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
iScience
Health sciences
Medicine
Virology
title Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
title_full Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
title_fullStr Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
title_full_unstemmed Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
title_short Positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
title_sort positive feedback loops exacerbate the influence of superspreaders in disease transmission
topic Health sciences
Medicine
Virology
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223006958
work_keys_str_mv AT klaramwanelik positivefeedbackloopsexacerbatetheinfluenceofsuperspreadersindiseasetransmission
AT mikebegon positivefeedbackloopsexacerbatetheinfluenceofsuperspreadersindiseasetransmission
AT andyfenton positivefeedbackloopsexacerbatetheinfluenceofsuperspreadersindiseasetransmission
AT rachelanorman positivefeedbackloopsexacerbatetheinfluenceofsuperspreadersindiseasetransmission
AT pablombeldomenico positivefeedbackloopsexacerbatetheinfluenceofsuperspreadersindiseasetransmission