Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research

This article discusses a case study to explore notions of academic freedom and freedom of speech in the post-apartheid South African university. The focus is on the ‘managerial turn’ in university management and in particular its utilisation of ethical regulation in humanities research. I argue tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mareli Stolp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2016-01-01
Series:Acta Academica
Online Access:http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/1502
_version_ 1797265709928022016
author Mareli Stolp
author_facet Mareli Stolp
author_sort Mareli Stolp
collection DOAJ
description This article discusses a case study to explore notions of academic freedom and freedom of speech in the post-apartheid South African university. The focus is on the ‘managerial turn’ in university management and in particular its utilisation of ethical regulation in humanities research. I argue that, in the case in question, managerial power mechanisms co-opted ethics into processes of censure and censorship. Ethical regulation in the humanities has been on the increase in South Africa and internationally in recent decades; I posit here that ethical regulation can be used as a managerial power mechanism in the control of research output. This has significant implications especially in the context of post-apartheid transformation of South African universities. I further posit that emergent and risk-taking research open up new spaces for exploration and investigation, and that the benefits of this kind of research must be balanced against possible ethical complexities.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:45:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe1fa882d326414db331944d6f7288c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0587-2405
2415-0479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:49:07Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Academica
spelling doaj.art-fe1fa882d326414db331944d6f7288c72024-03-11T23:03:47ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Academica0587-24052415-04792016-01-01481Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities researchMareli Stolp0University of South Africa This article discusses a case study to explore notions of academic freedom and freedom of speech in the post-apartheid South African university. The focus is on the ‘managerial turn’ in university management and in particular its utilisation of ethical regulation in humanities research. I argue that, in the case in question, managerial power mechanisms co-opted ethics into processes of censure and censorship. Ethical regulation in the humanities has been on the increase in South Africa and internationally in recent decades; I posit here that ethical regulation can be used as a managerial power mechanism in the control of research output. This has significant implications especially in the context of post-apartheid transformation of South African universities. I further posit that emergent and risk-taking research open up new spaces for exploration and investigation, and that the benefits of this kind of research must be balanced against possible ethical complexities. http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/1502
spellingShingle Mareli Stolp
Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
Acta Academica
title Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
title_full Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
title_fullStr Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
title_full_unstemmed Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
title_short Report to the academy: power and ethics in humanities research
title_sort report to the academy power and ethics in humanities research
url http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/aa/article/view/1502
work_keys_str_mv AT marelistolp reporttotheacademypowerandethicsinhumanitiesresearch