Middlebrow modernism in film(theory): Visconti’s Senso (1954) vis-à-vis Diamant-Berger’s La madone des sleepings (1955)

By reflecting upon the travelling concept of the (film) ‘auteur’, the first part of the article argues that Modernism manifests itself differently in cinema studies than in literary studies. Whereas the literary canon is constituted by excluding anything connoting conventional reading matter, a ‘pan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Verstraten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Radboud University Press in cooperation with Open Journals 2015-06-01
Series:Relief: Revue Électronique de Littérature Francaise
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revue-relief.org/articles/10.18352/relief.909/
Description
Summary:By reflecting upon the travelling concept of the (film) ‘auteur’, the first part of the article argues that Modernism manifests itself differently in cinema studies than in literary studies. Whereas the literary canon is constituted by excluding anything connoting conventional reading matter, a ‘pantheon’ of great directors exhibits a ‘peaceful coexistence’ between popular films and art cinema. The second part of the article addresses the shift in Rudolf Arnheim’s film theory from die-hard Modernist in the 1930s to middlebrow Modernist in the 1950s in a period when Henri Diamant-Berger made an adaptation of Maurice Dekobra’s La madone des sleepings. Concerned with a ‘psychology of art’, Arnheim is to claim a ‘stylized simplicity’ which in the end is better represented by Luchino Visconti’s colourful but nonetheless ‘sophisticated’ melodrama Senso than by Diamant-Berger’s too modest picture. Visconti’s film gives body to the idea of film as a ‘pan-art’, which implies that it is characteristic of cinema to incorporate influences from other art films but also to parasite upon sentimentalism and (high) emotion.
ISSN:1873-5045