L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration
In the ontology of the work of art and its regimes of existence, Gérard Genette gives but little room to the theory and practice of restoration. However, restoration is seen in relation to the identity of the work itself and to its material and pragmatic temporality and anachronism. In the wake of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Firenze University Press
2012-05-01
|
| Series: | Aisthesis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10982 |
| _version_ | 1819123014469419008 |
|---|---|
| author | Filippo Fimiani |
| author_facet | Filippo Fimiani |
| author_sort | Filippo Fimiani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the ontology of the work of art and its regimes of existence, Gérard Genette gives but little room to the theory and practice of restoration. However, restoration is seen in relation to the identity of the work itself and to its material and pragmatic temporality and anachronism. In the wake of Nelson Goodman, it is also understood as a form of actuation of the aesthetic experience. Starting from these premises, the present essay intends to examine the relationship between Genette’s and Daniel Arasse’s reflections on restoration and the history of art, highlighting their similarities and differences with Cesare Brandi’s theory of restoration and, therefore, pointing out their as yet undischarged debts to Sartre’s phenomenology of image. <p> </p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:01:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fe2aec56409c4383bf7e92575d8b39e2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2035-8466 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:01:37Z |
| publishDate | 2012-05-01 |
| publisher | Firenze University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Aisthesis |
| spelling | doaj.art-fe2aec56409c4383bf7e92575d8b39e22022-12-21T18:34:47ZengFirenze University PressAisthesis2035-84662012-05-014110.13128/Aisthesis-109829921L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restaurationFilippo FimianiIn the ontology of the work of art and its regimes of existence, Gérard Genette gives but little room to the theory and practice of restoration. However, restoration is seen in relation to the identity of the work itself and to its material and pragmatic temporality and anachronism. In the wake of Nelson Goodman, it is also understood as a form of actuation of the aesthetic experience. Starting from these premises, the present essay intends to examine the relationship between Genette’s and Daniel Arasse’s reflections on restoration and the history of art, highlighting their similarities and differences with Cesare Brandi’s theory of restoration and, therefore, pointing out their as yet undischarged debts to Sartre’s phenomenology of image. <p> </p>http://www.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10982RestorationBrandiAesthetic experienceGenette. |
| spellingShingle | Filippo Fimiani L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration Aisthesis Restoration Brandi Aesthetic experience Genette. |
| title | L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration |
| title_full | L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration |
| title_fullStr | L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration |
| title_short | L’art désœuvré, modes d’emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration |
| title_sort | l art desoeuvre modes d emploi entre esthetique et theorie de la restauration |
| topic | Restoration Brandi Aesthetic experience Genette. |
| url | http://www.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/10982 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT filippofimiani lartdesœuvremodesdemploientreesthetiqueettheoriedelarestauration |