Doubly Engaged Ethnography

Understanding the unique challenges facing vulnerable communities necessitates a scholarly approach that is profoundly embedded in the ethnographic tradition. Undertaking ethnographies of communities and populations facing huge degrees of inequality and abject poverty asks of the researcher to be ab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raul Pacheco-Vega, Kate Parizeau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-08-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918790653
_version_ 1818115359121604608
author Raul Pacheco-Vega
Kate Parizeau
author_facet Raul Pacheco-Vega
Kate Parizeau
author_sort Raul Pacheco-Vega
collection DOAJ
description Understanding the unique challenges facing vulnerable communities necessitates a scholarly approach that is profoundly embedded in the ethnographic tradition. Undertaking ethnographies of communities and populations facing huge degrees of inequality and abject poverty asks of the researcher to be able to think hard about issues of positionality (what are our multiple subjectivities as insider/outsider, knowledge holder/learner, and so on when interacting with vulnerable subjects, and how does this influence the research?), issues of engagement versus exploitation (how can we meaningfully incentivize participation in our studies without being coercive/extractive, and can we expect vulnerable subjects to become deeply in research design/data collection, and so on when they are so overburdened already?), and representation (what are the ethics of representing violence, racism, and sexism as expressed by vulnerable respondents? What about the pictures we take and the stories we tell?). Through the discussion of our research on the behavioral patterns, socialization strategies, and garbage processing methods of informal waste pickers in Argentina and Mexico, we ask ourselves, and through this exercise, seek to shed light on the broader questions of how can we engage in ethnographies of vulnerable communities while maintaining a sense of objectivity and protecting our informants? Rather than attempting to provide a definite answer, we provide a starting point for scholars of resource governance interested in using ethnographic methods for their research. We highlight the challenges we’ve faced in studying cartoneros in Buenos Aires (Argentina) and pepenadores in León (Mexico) and engage in a self-reflective discussion of what can be learned from our struggle to provide meaningful, engaged scholarship while retaining and ensuring respect and care for the communities we study.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:05:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe2e6a5af0da4a2996f04bf6f667e1c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1609-4069
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:05:22Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
spelling doaj.art-fe2e6a5af0da4a2996f04bf6f667e1c52022-12-22T01:21:31ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692018-08-011710.1177/1609406918790653Doubly Engaged EthnographyRaul Pacheco-Vega0Kate Parizeau1 Public Administration Division, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Aguascalientes, Mexico Department of Geography, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaUnderstanding the unique challenges facing vulnerable communities necessitates a scholarly approach that is profoundly embedded in the ethnographic tradition. Undertaking ethnographies of communities and populations facing huge degrees of inequality and abject poverty asks of the researcher to be able to think hard about issues of positionality (what are our multiple subjectivities as insider/outsider, knowledge holder/learner, and so on when interacting with vulnerable subjects, and how does this influence the research?), issues of engagement versus exploitation (how can we meaningfully incentivize participation in our studies without being coercive/extractive, and can we expect vulnerable subjects to become deeply in research design/data collection, and so on when they are so overburdened already?), and representation (what are the ethics of representing violence, racism, and sexism as expressed by vulnerable respondents? What about the pictures we take and the stories we tell?). Through the discussion of our research on the behavioral patterns, socialization strategies, and garbage processing methods of informal waste pickers in Argentina and Mexico, we ask ourselves, and through this exercise, seek to shed light on the broader questions of how can we engage in ethnographies of vulnerable communities while maintaining a sense of objectivity and protecting our informants? Rather than attempting to provide a definite answer, we provide a starting point for scholars of resource governance interested in using ethnographic methods for their research. We highlight the challenges we’ve faced in studying cartoneros in Buenos Aires (Argentina) and pepenadores in León (Mexico) and engage in a self-reflective discussion of what can be learned from our struggle to provide meaningful, engaged scholarship while retaining and ensuring respect and care for the communities we study.https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918790653
spellingShingle Raul Pacheco-Vega
Kate Parizeau
Doubly Engaged Ethnography
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
title Doubly Engaged Ethnography
title_full Doubly Engaged Ethnography
title_fullStr Doubly Engaged Ethnography
title_full_unstemmed Doubly Engaged Ethnography
title_short Doubly Engaged Ethnography
title_sort doubly engaged ethnography
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918790653
work_keys_str_mv AT raulpachecovega doublyengagedethnography
AT kateparizeau doublyengagedethnography