Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study

After cerebellar stroke, cognition can be impaired, as described within the framework of the so-called Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS). However, it remains unclear whether visual neglect can also be part of CCAS. We describe the case of a patient with a subacute cerebellar stroke afte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nora Geiser, Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann, Henrik Rühe, Noortje Maaijwee, Tobias Nef, Dario Cazzoli, Thomas Nyffeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/290
_version_ 1797482180786520064
author Nora Geiser
Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann
Henrik Rühe
Noortje Maaijwee
Tobias Nef
Dario Cazzoli
Thomas Nyffeler
author_facet Nora Geiser
Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann
Henrik Rühe
Noortje Maaijwee
Tobias Nef
Dario Cazzoli
Thomas Nyffeler
author_sort Nora Geiser
collection DOAJ
description After cerebellar stroke, cognition can be impaired, as described within the framework of the so-called Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS). However, it remains unclear whether visual neglect can also be part of CCAS. We describe the case of a patient with a subacute cerebellar stroke after thrombosis of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), who showed a left-sided visual neglect, indicating that the cerebellum also has a modulatory function on visual attention. The neglect, however, was mild and only detectable when using the sensitive neuro-psychological Five-Point Test as well as video-oculography assessment, yet remained unnoticed when evaluated with common neglect-specific paper-pencil tests. Three weeks later, follow-up assessments revealed an amelioration of neglect symptoms. Therefore, these findings suggest that visual neglect may be a part of CCAS, but that the choice of neglect assessments and the time delay since stroke onset may be crucial. Although the exact underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear, we propose cerebellar–cerebral diaschisis as a possible explanation of why neglect can occur on the ipsilateral side. Further research applying sensitive assessment tools at different post-stroke stages is needed to investigate the incidence, lesion correlates, and pathophysiology of neglect after cerebellar lesions.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:27:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe317f55e5174e3fb2a33a54861e9972
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:27:35Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-fe317f55e5174e3fb2a33a54861e99722023-11-23T19:04:35ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252022-02-0112229010.3390/brainsci12020290Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case StudyNora Geiser0Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann1Henrik Rühe2Noortje Maaijwee3Tobias Nef4Dario Cazzoli5Thomas Nyffeler6Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, SwitzerlandNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandNeurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, SwitzerlandAfter cerebellar stroke, cognition can be impaired, as described within the framework of the so-called Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS). However, it remains unclear whether visual neglect can also be part of CCAS. We describe the case of a patient with a subacute cerebellar stroke after thrombosis of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), who showed a left-sided visual neglect, indicating that the cerebellum also has a modulatory function on visual attention. The neglect, however, was mild and only detectable when using the sensitive neuro-psychological Five-Point Test as well as video-oculography assessment, yet remained unnoticed when evaluated with common neglect-specific paper-pencil tests. Three weeks later, follow-up assessments revealed an amelioration of neglect symptoms. Therefore, these findings suggest that visual neglect may be a part of CCAS, but that the choice of neglect assessments and the time delay since stroke onset may be crucial. Although the exact underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear, we propose cerebellar–cerebral diaschisis as a possible explanation of why neglect can occur on the ipsilateral side. Further research applying sensitive assessment tools at different post-stroke stages is needed to investigate the incidence, lesion correlates, and pathophysiology of neglect after cerebellar lesions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/290neglectPICAvideo-oculographyfree visual explorationstroke
spellingShingle Nora Geiser
Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann
Henrik Rühe
Noortje Maaijwee
Tobias Nef
Dario Cazzoli
Thomas Nyffeler
Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
Brain Sciences
neglect
PICA
video-oculography
free visual exploration
stroke
title Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
title_full Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
title_fullStr Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
title_short Visual Neglect after PICA Stroke—A Case Study
title_sort visual neglect after pica stroke a case study
topic neglect
PICA
video-oculography
free visual exploration
stroke
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/290
work_keys_str_mv AT norageiser visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT brigittecharlottekaufmann visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT henrikruhe visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT noortjemaaijwee visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT tobiasnef visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT dariocazzoli visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy
AT thomasnyffeler visualneglectafterpicastrokeacasestudy