Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE

Objective Studies show that generic cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction tools may underestimate CVR in SLE. We examined, for the first time to our knowledge, whether generic and disease-adapted CVR scores may predict subclinical atherosclerosis progression in SLE.Methods We included all eligible pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria G Tektonidou, Petros P Sfikakis, Stylianos Panopoulos, George Konstantonis, George C Drosos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-01
Series:Lupus Science and Medicine
Online Access:https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/1/e000864.full
_version_ 1811160197404557312
author Maria G Tektonidou
Petros P Sfikakis
Stylianos Panopoulos
George Konstantonis
George C Drosos
author_facet Maria G Tektonidou
Petros P Sfikakis
Stylianos Panopoulos
George Konstantonis
George C Drosos
author_sort Maria G Tektonidou
collection DOAJ
description Objective Studies show that generic cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction tools may underestimate CVR in SLE. We examined, for the first time to our knowledge, whether generic and disease-adapted CVR scores may predict subclinical atherosclerosis progression in SLE.Methods We included all eligible patients with SLE without a history of cardiovascular events or diabetes mellitus, who had a 3-year carotid and femoral ultrasound follow-up examination. Five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equation, Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster) and three ‘SLE-adapted’ CVR scores (modified Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (mSCORE), modified Framingham Risk Score (mFRS), QRESEARCH Risk Estimator V.3 (QRISK3)) were calculated at baseline. The performance of CVR scores to predict atherosclerosis progression (defined as new atherosclerotic plaque development) was tested with Brier Score (BS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), while rank correlation was tested with Harrell’s c-index. Binary logistic regression was also applied to examine determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis progression.Results Twenty-six (21%) of 124 included patients (90% female, mean age 44.4±11.7 years) developed new atherosclerotic plaques after a mean of 39.7±3.8 months’ follow-up period. Performance analysis showed that plaque progression was better predicted by the mFRS (BS 0.14, AUROC 0.80, MCC 0.22) and QRISK3 (BS 0.16, AUROC 0.75, MCC 0.25). c-Index showed no superiority for discrimination between mFRS and QRISK3. In the multivariate analysis, QRISK3 (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.30 to 13.78, p=0.016) among the CVR prediction scores and age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21, p<0.001), cumulative glucocorticoid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.010) and antiphospholipid antibodies (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 10.80, p=0.019) among disease-related CVR factors were independently associated with plaque progression.Conclusions Application of SLE-adapted CVR scores such as QRISK3 or mFRS, as well as monitoring for glucocorticoid exposure and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, can help to improve CVR assessment and management in SLE.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:54:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe3345ac9d8a4e65961078f45dc5f454
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-8790
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:54:39Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Lupus Science and Medicine
spelling doaj.art-fe3345ac9d8a4e65961078f45dc5f4542023-03-04T03:30:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupLupus Science and Medicine2053-87902023-03-0110110.1136/lupus-2022-000864Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLEMaria G Tektonidou0Petros P Sfikakis1Stylianos Panopoulos2George Konstantonis3George C Drosos41 First Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece12 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece1 Joint Rheumatology Program, First Department of Internal Medicine, Propedeutic Clinic, “Laiko” hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GreeceJoint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Faculty of Medicine, Athens, Greece1 First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GreeceObjective Studies show that generic cardiovascular risk (CVR) prediction tools may underestimate CVR in SLE. We examined, for the first time to our knowledge, whether generic and disease-adapted CVR scores may predict subclinical atherosclerosis progression in SLE.Methods We included all eligible patients with SLE without a history of cardiovascular events or diabetes mellitus, who had a 3-year carotid and femoral ultrasound follow-up examination. Five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equation, Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster) and three ‘SLE-adapted’ CVR scores (modified Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (mSCORE), modified Framingham Risk Score (mFRS), QRESEARCH Risk Estimator V.3 (QRISK3)) were calculated at baseline. The performance of CVR scores to predict atherosclerosis progression (defined as new atherosclerotic plaque development) was tested with Brier Score (BS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), while rank correlation was tested with Harrell’s c-index. Binary logistic regression was also applied to examine determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis progression.Results Twenty-six (21%) of 124 included patients (90% female, mean age 44.4±11.7 years) developed new atherosclerotic plaques after a mean of 39.7±3.8 months’ follow-up period. Performance analysis showed that plaque progression was better predicted by the mFRS (BS 0.14, AUROC 0.80, MCC 0.22) and QRISK3 (BS 0.16, AUROC 0.75, MCC 0.25). c-Index showed no superiority for discrimination between mFRS and QRISK3. In the multivariate analysis, QRISK3 (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.30 to 13.78, p=0.016) among the CVR prediction scores and age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21, p<0.001), cumulative glucocorticoid dose (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.010) and antiphospholipid antibodies (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 10.80, p=0.019) among disease-related CVR factors were independently associated with plaque progression.Conclusions Application of SLE-adapted CVR scores such as QRISK3 or mFRS, as well as monitoring for glucocorticoid exposure and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, can help to improve CVR assessment and management in SLE.https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/1/e000864.full
spellingShingle Maria G Tektonidou
Petros P Sfikakis
Stylianos Panopoulos
George Konstantonis
George C Drosos
Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
Lupus Science and Medicine
title Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
title_full Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
title_fullStr Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
title_full_unstemmed Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
title_short Generic and disease-adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in SLE
title_sort generic and disease adapted cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of atherosclerosis progression in sle
url https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/1/e000864.full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariagtektonidou genericanddiseaseadaptedcardiovascularriskscoresaspredictorsofatherosclerosisprogressioninsle
AT petrospsfikakis genericanddiseaseadaptedcardiovascularriskscoresaspredictorsofatherosclerosisprogressioninsle
AT stylianospanopoulos genericanddiseaseadaptedcardiovascularriskscoresaspredictorsofatherosclerosisprogressioninsle
AT georgekonstantonis genericanddiseaseadaptedcardiovascularriskscoresaspredictorsofatherosclerosisprogressioninsle
AT georgecdrosos genericanddiseaseadaptedcardiovascularriskscoresaspredictorsofatherosclerosisprogressioninsle