Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences

We conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for their decisions and subjects who consider hypothetical stakes. Our findings indica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Bühren, Thorben C. Kundt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2015-03-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003946/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797701707147247616
author Christoph Bühren
Thorben C. Kundt
author_facet Christoph Bühren
Thorben C. Kundt
author_sort Christoph Bühren
collection DOAJ
description We conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for their decisions and subjects who consider hypothetical stakes. Our findings indicate that, apart from incentives, gender plays an important role for the categorization of different social preferences.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:40:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe490f0632134394ab135de4b670da93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:40:35Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-fe490f0632134394ab135de4b670da932023-09-03T09:45:53ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-03-011018519010.1017/S1930297500003946Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferencesChristoph Bühren0Thorben C. KundtDepartment of Economics, University of Kassel, Nora-Platiel-Str. 4, 34127 Kassel, GermanyWe conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for their decisions and subjects who consider hypothetical stakes. Our findings indicate that, apart from incentives, gender plays an important role for the categorization of different social preferences.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003946/type/journal_articlesocial preferencesgenerosityegalitarianismincentive mechanismsdictator games
spellingShingle Christoph Bühren
Thorben C. Kundt
Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
Judgment and Decision Making
social preferences
generosity
egalitarianism
incentive mechanisms
dictator games
title Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
title_full Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
title_fullStr Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
title_full_unstemmed Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
title_short Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences
title_sort imagine being a nice guy a note on hypothetical vs incentivized social preferences
topic social preferences
generosity
egalitarianism
incentive mechanisms
dictator games
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003946/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT christophbuhren imaginebeinganiceguyanoteonhypotheticalvsincentivizedsocialpreferences
AT thorbenckundt imaginebeinganiceguyanoteonhypotheticalvsincentivizedsocialpreferences