Programme choice for perimetry in neurological conditions (PoPiN): a systematic review of perimetry options and patterns of visual field loss
Abstract Background Visual field loss occurs frequently in neurological conditions and perimetry is commonly requested for patients with suspected or known conditions. There are currently no guidelines for how visual fields in neurological conditions should be assessed. There is a wide range of visu...
Main Authors: | Lauren R. Hepworth, Fiona J. Rowe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-018-0912-1 |
Similar Items
-
Short-Listing the Program Choice for Perimetry in Neurological Conditions (PoPiN) Using Consensus Methods
by: Lauren Hepworth, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Interpreting automated perimetry.
by: Shukla Yogesh
Published: (2001-01-01) -
Red flags and artifacts in perimetry
by: Tarannum Mansoori
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry
by: Xiaoxiao Ma, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Long-term variability in short-wavelength automated perimetry compared to standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects
by: Chintan Malhotra
Published: (2009-01-01)