Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro

Abstract Objective Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen that causes disease worldwide in young foals and immunocompromised humans. The interactions of R. equi with the host immune system have been described; however, most studies have been conducted using a few well-characterized strains. B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adina R. Bujold, Nicholas R. Lani, Macarena G. Sanz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4560-1
_version_ 1818267345980751872
author Adina R. Bujold
Nicholas R. Lani
Macarena G. Sanz
author_facet Adina R. Bujold
Nicholas R. Lani
Macarena G. Sanz
author_sort Adina R. Bujold
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen that causes disease worldwide in young foals and immunocompromised humans. The interactions of R. equi with the host immune system have been described; however, most studies have been conducted using a few well-characterized strains. Because biological differences between R. equi strains are not well characterized, it is unknown if experimental results will replicate when different strains are used. Therefore, our objective was to compare the growth and biofilm formation of low-passage-rate clinical isolates of R. equi to higher-passage-rate, commonly studied isolates to determine whether strain-to-strain variation exists. Results Twelve strains were used: 103+, ATCC 33701, UKVDL206 103S harboring a GFP-expressing plasmid, a plasmid-cured 33701 (higher-passage-rate) and seven low-passage clinical isolates. Generation time in liquid revealed fast, moderate-fast, moderate-slow, and slow-growing isolates. The higher-passage-rate isolates were among the moderate-slow growing strains. A strain’s rate of growth did not correspond to its ability to form biofilm nor to its colony size on solid media. Based on our results, care should be taken not to extrapolate in vitro work that may be conducted using different R. equi strains. Further work is needed to evaluate the effect that the observed differences may have on experimental results.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T20:21:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe715651743e4381acf5133cf4aadf5d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T20:21:08Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-fe715651743e4381acf5133cf4aadf5d2022-12-22T00:13:15ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002019-08-011211610.1186/s13104-019-4560-1Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitroAdina R. Bujold0Nicholas R. Lani1Macarena G. Sanz2Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State UniversityDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State UniversityDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State UniversityAbstract Objective Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen that causes disease worldwide in young foals and immunocompromised humans. The interactions of R. equi with the host immune system have been described; however, most studies have been conducted using a few well-characterized strains. Because biological differences between R. equi strains are not well characterized, it is unknown if experimental results will replicate when different strains are used. Therefore, our objective was to compare the growth and biofilm formation of low-passage-rate clinical isolates of R. equi to higher-passage-rate, commonly studied isolates to determine whether strain-to-strain variation exists. Results Twelve strains were used: 103+, ATCC 33701, UKVDL206 103S harboring a GFP-expressing plasmid, a plasmid-cured 33701 (higher-passage-rate) and seven low-passage clinical isolates. Generation time in liquid revealed fast, moderate-fast, moderate-slow, and slow-growing isolates. The higher-passage-rate isolates were among the moderate-slow growing strains. A strain’s rate of growth did not correspond to its ability to form biofilm nor to its colony size on solid media. Based on our results, care should be taken not to extrapolate in vitro work that may be conducted using different R. equi strains. Further work is needed to evaluate the effect that the observed differences may have on experimental results.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4560-1Rhodococcus equiStrain-to-strain variationGrowthBiofilm
spellingShingle Adina R. Bujold
Nicholas R. Lani
Macarena G. Sanz
Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
BMC Research Notes
Rhodococcus equi
Strain-to-strain variation
Growth
Biofilm
title Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
title_full Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
title_fullStr Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
title_short Strain-to-strain variation of Rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
title_sort strain to strain variation of rhodococcus equi growth and biofilm formation in vitro
topic Rhodococcus equi
Strain-to-strain variation
Growth
Biofilm
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-019-4560-1
work_keys_str_mv AT adinarbujold straintostrainvariationofrhodococcusequigrowthandbiofilmformationinvitro
AT nicholasrlani straintostrainvariationofrhodococcusequigrowthandbiofilmformationinvitro
AT macarenagsanz straintostrainvariationofrhodococcusequigrowthandbiofilmformationinvitro