The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids

Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4)/GPR120 comprises a receptor for medium‐ and long‐chain fatty acids. We previously identified phytosphingosine (PHS) as a novel ligand of FFAR4. Although many natural FFAR4 ligands have carboxyl groups, PHS does not, thus suggesting that binding to FFAR4 is driven b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomotaka Nagasawa, Masaki Horitani, Shin‐ichi Kawaguchi, Shigeki Higashiyama, Yoichiro Hama, Susumu Mitsutake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-11-01
Series:FEBS Open Bio
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13301
_version_ 1818742875375009792
author Tomotaka Nagasawa
Masaki Horitani
Shin‐ichi Kawaguchi
Shigeki Higashiyama
Yoichiro Hama
Susumu Mitsutake
author_facet Tomotaka Nagasawa
Masaki Horitani
Shin‐ichi Kawaguchi
Shigeki Higashiyama
Yoichiro Hama
Susumu Mitsutake
author_sort Tomotaka Nagasawa
collection DOAJ
description Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4)/GPR120 comprises a receptor for medium‐ and long‐chain fatty acids. We previously identified phytosphingosine (PHS) as a novel ligand of FFAR4. Although many natural FFAR4 ligands have carboxyl groups, PHS does not, thus suggesting that binding to FFAR4 is driven by a completely different mechanism than other natural ligands such as α‐linolenic acid (ALA). To test this hypothesis, we performed docking simulation analysis using a FFAR4 homology model based on a protein model derived from the crystal structure of activated turkey beta‐1 adrenoceptor. The docking simulation revealed that the probable hydrogen bonds to FFAR4 differ between various ligands. In particular, binding was predicted between R264 of the FFAR4 and the oxygen of the carboxylate group in ALA, as well as between E249 of the FFAR4 and the oxygen of the hydroxy group at the C4‐position in PHS. Alanine substitution at E249 (E249A) dramatically reduced PHS‐induced FFAR4 activation but demonstrated a weaker effect on ALA‐induced FFAR4 activation. Kinetic analysis and Km values clearly demonstrated that the E249A substitution resulted in reduced affinity for PHS but not for ALA. Additionally, we observed that sphingosine, lacking a hydroxyl group at C4‐position, could not activate FFAR4. Our data show that E249 of the FFAR4 receptor is crucial for binding to the hydroxy group at the C4‐position in PHS, and this is a completely different molecular mechanism of binding from ALA. Because GPR120 agonists have attracted attention as treatments for type 2 diabetes, our findings may provide new insights into their development.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T02:19:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe7b075bd2064db99a4e381cddb5c74c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-5463
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T02:19:28Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series FEBS Open Bio
spelling doaj.art-fe7b075bd2064db99a4e381cddb5c74c2022-12-21T21:24:18ZengWileyFEBS Open Bio2211-54632021-11-0111113081308910.1002/2211-5463.13301The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acidsTomotaka Nagasawa0Masaki Horitani1Shin‐ichi Kawaguchi2Shigeki Higashiyama3Yoichiro Hama4Susumu Mitsutake5The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima JapanThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima JapanThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima JapanDivision of Cell Growth and Tumor Regulation Proteo‐Science Center Ehime University Matsuyama JapanThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima JapanThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima JapanFree fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4)/GPR120 comprises a receptor for medium‐ and long‐chain fatty acids. We previously identified phytosphingosine (PHS) as a novel ligand of FFAR4. Although many natural FFAR4 ligands have carboxyl groups, PHS does not, thus suggesting that binding to FFAR4 is driven by a completely different mechanism than other natural ligands such as α‐linolenic acid (ALA). To test this hypothesis, we performed docking simulation analysis using a FFAR4 homology model based on a protein model derived from the crystal structure of activated turkey beta‐1 adrenoceptor. The docking simulation revealed that the probable hydrogen bonds to FFAR4 differ between various ligands. In particular, binding was predicted between R264 of the FFAR4 and the oxygen of the carboxylate group in ALA, as well as between E249 of the FFAR4 and the oxygen of the hydroxy group at the C4‐position in PHS. Alanine substitution at E249 (E249A) dramatically reduced PHS‐induced FFAR4 activation but demonstrated a weaker effect on ALA‐induced FFAR4 activation. Kinetic analysis and Km values clearly demonstrated that the E249A substitution resulted in reduced affinity for PHS but not for ALA. Additionally, we observed that sphingosine, lacking a hydroxyl group at C4‐position, could not activate FFAR4. Our data show that E249 of the FFAR4 receptor is crucial for binding to the hydroxy group at the C4‐position in PHS, and this is a completely different molecular mechanism of binding from ALA. Because GPR120 agonists have attracted attention as treatments for type 2 diabetes, our findings may provide new insights into their development.https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13301FFAR4GPCRGPR120phytosphingosinesphingolipidsphingosine
spellingShingle Tomotaka Nagasawa
Masaki Horitani
Shin‐ichi Kawaguchi
Shigeki Higashiyama
Yoichiro Hama
Susumu Mitsutake
The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
FEBS Open Bio
FFAR4
GPCR
GPR120
phytosphingosine
sphingolipid
sphingosine
title The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
title_full The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
title_fullStr The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
title_full_unstemmed The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
title_short The molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to FFAR4/GPR120 differs from that of other fatty acids
title_sort molecular mechanism of phytosphingosine binding to ffar4 gpr120 differs from that of other fatty acids
topic FFAR4
GPCR
GPR120
phytosphingosine
sphingolipid
sphingosine
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13301
work_keys_str_mv AT tomotakanagasawa themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT masakihoritani themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT shinichikawaguchi themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT shigekihigashiyama themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT yoichirohama themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT susumumitsutake themolecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT tomotakanagasawa molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT masakihoritani molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT shinichikawaguchi molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT shigekihigashiyama molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT yoichirohama molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids
AT susumumitsutake molecularmechanismofphytosphingosinebindingtoffar4gpr120differsfromthatofotherfattyacids