Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017
This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary exec...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2020-05-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1570 |
| _version_ | 1828010294184509440 |
|---|---|
| author | Titon Slamet Kurnia |
| author_facet | Titon Slamet Kurnia |
| author_sort | Titon Slamet Kurnia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary executive theory. According to the unitary executive theory, the president should have the power to appoint and remove any executive official exclusively. This norm is based on the status of the president as the Chief Executive. According to this notion, the KPK, as independent agency, is unconstitutional. In line with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017, qualifying the KPK as executive, our abnormal constitutional order, with the existence of the KPK, should be normalized in accordance with the unitary executive theory.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fe7bf2c8ea214afaba0d58caab847bb6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:59Z |
| publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj.art-fe7bf2c8ea214afaba0d58caab847bb62023-02-22T04:10:16ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572020-05-0117110.31078/jk1716472Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017Titon Slamet Kurnia0Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana This article expresses the author’s view to disagree with the existence of the KPK and its supporting Constitutional Theory. This article is based on classical model of the trias politica theory and suggests that the existence of executive bodies should conform with the prescription of unitary executive theory. According to the unitary executive theory, the president should have the power to appoint and remove any executive official exclusively. This norm is based on the status of the president as the Chief Executive. According to this notion, the KPK, as independent agency, is unconstitutional. In line with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017, qualifying the KPK as executive, our abnormal constitutional order, with the existence of the KPK, should be normalized in accordance with the unitary executive theory. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1570KPKConstitutionalityUnitary Executive |
| spellingShingle | Titon Slamet Kurnia Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Jurnal Konstitusi KPK Constitutionality Unitary Executive |
| title | Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 |
| title_full | Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 |
| title_fullStr | Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 |
| title_short | Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai Tata Konstitusional Abnormal dan Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 |
| title_sort | komisi pemberantasan korupsi sebagai tata konstitusional abnormal dan implikasi yuridis putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 36 puu xv 2017 |
| topic | KPK Constitutionality Unitary Executive |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1570 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT titonslametkurnia komisipemberantasankorupsisebagaitatakonstitusionalabnormaldanimplikasiyuridisputusanmahkamahkonstitusinomor36puuxv2017 |