Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency tympanic membrane traumatic defect silicone disc shielding in combination with endaural laser therapy depending on the defect location.Materials and methods. The paper analyzes the results of treatment of 50 patients. The first group (25 people) –...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. N. Kocherov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk) 2016-10-01
Series:Бюллетень сибирской медицины
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/665
_version_ 1797872940718489600
author S. N. Kocherov
author_facet S. N. Kocherov
author_sort S. N. Kocherov
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency tympanic membrane traumatic defect silicone disc shielding in combination with endaural laser therapy depending on the defect location.Materials and methods. The paper analyzes the results of treatment of 50 patients. The first group (25 people) – had a defect in frontal quadrant, the second group (25 people) – in rear forated silicone disk and endaural laser therapy. Each patient received six three-minute radiation sessions. A single biological dose was 50 J/cm2, the total of 300 J/cm2. Results and discussion. Tympanic membrane defect area was evaluated in each group in dynamics. In the first group before the start of treatment, the average perforations area was (14,2 ± 0,93) mm2, and in the second group (18,6 ± 2,31) mm2. After three months of first group observation in 2 (8%) patients tympanic membrane remained defective and the average area was (3,4 ± 071) mm2. The second group the perforation observed in 1 (4%) patient and average area was (2,8 ± 0,63) mm2 area. The differences in groups were considered statistically significant. The average duration of restoration tympanic membrane integrity in first group was (16 ± 5) days, the second group (11 ± 3) days. The differences in groups were considered statistically significant (t = –3,3; p = 0,003).Conclusion. Thus, posterior quadrants tympanic membrane traumatic perforations demonstrated more favorable prognosis in terms of convalescence.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T01:07:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe8522d7dcaa4cc3b09fa20d054f7420
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1682-0363
1819-3684
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T01:07:03Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk)
record_format Article
series Бюллетень сибирской медицины
spelling doaj.art-fe8522d7dcaa4cc3b09fa20d054f74202023-03-13T09:58:22ZengSiberian State Medical University (Tomsk)Бюллетень сибирской медицины1682-03631819-36842016-10-01154596610.20538/1682-0363-2016-4-59-66584Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localizationS. N. Kocherov0Сибирский государственный медицинский университет Россия, 634050, г. Томск, Московский тракт, 2The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency tympanic membrane traumatic defect silicone disc shielding in combination with endaural laser therapy depending on the defect location.Materials and methods. The paper analyzes the results of treatment of 50 patients. The first group (25 people) – had a defect in frontal quadrant, the second group (25 people) – in rear forated silicone disk and endaural laser therapy. Each patient received six three-minute radiation sessions. A single biological dose was 50 J/cm2, the total of 300 J/cm2. Results and discussion. Tympanic membrane defect area was evaluated in each group in dynamics. In the first group before the start of treatment, the average perforations area was (14,2 ± 0,93) mm2, and in the second group (18,6 ± 2,31) mm2. After three months of first group observation in 2 (8%) patients tympanic membrane remained defective and the average area was (3,4 ± 071) mm2. The second group the perforation observed in 1 (4%) patient and average area was (2,8 ± 0,63) mm2 area. The differences in groups were considered statistically significant. The average duration of restoration tympanic membrane integrity in first group was (16 ± 5) days, the second group (11 ± 3) days. The differences in groups were considered statistically significant (t = –3,3; p = 0,003).Conclusion. Thus, posterior quadrants tympanic membrane traumatic perforations demonstrated more favorable prognosis in terms of convalescence.https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/665барабанная перепонкаэкранирование травматического дефектаэндауральная лазеротерапиялечение травматических перфораций
spellingShingle S. N. Kocherov
Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
Бюллетень сибирской медицины
барабанная перепонка
экранирование травматического дефекта
эндауральная лазеротерапия
лечение травматических перфораций
title Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
title_full Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
title_short Comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery, depending localization
title_sort comparative evaluation of the tympanic membrane perforations recovery depending localization
topic барабанная перепонка
экранирование травматического дефекта
эндауральная лазеротерапия
лечение травматических перфораций
url https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/665
work_keys_str_mv AT snkocherov comparativeevaluationofthetympanicmembraneperforationsrecoverydependinglocalization