ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes

The use of collaborative exercises (CE) and proficiency tests (PT) as part of the governance programme for any forensic science laboratory has become commonplace and recommended by several international organisations. Traditionally these have been discipline-specific exercises testing a laboratory&#...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Zampa, H. Bandey, A. Bécue, E. Bouzaid, M.J. Branco, J. Buegler, M. Kambosos, S. Kneppers, K. Kriiska-Maiväli, A. Mattei, L. Zatkalikova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Forensic Science International: Synergy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000123
_version_ 1797220306053496832
author F. Zampa
H. Bandey
A. Bécue
E. Bouzaid
M.J. Branco
J. Buegler
M. Kambosos
S. Kneppers
K. Kriiska-Maiväli
A. Mattei
L. Zatkalikova
author_facet F. Zampa
H. Bandey
A. Bécue
E. Bouzaid
M.J. Branco
J. Buegler
M. Kambosos
S. Kneppers
K. Kriiska-Maiväli
A. Mattei
L. Zatkalikova
author_sort F. Zampa
collection DOAJ
description The use of collaborative exercises (CE) and proficiency tests (PT) as part of the governance programme for any forensic science laboratory has become commonplace and recommended by several international organisations. Traditionally these have been discipline-specific exercises testing a laboratory's ability in a single area of forensic science. However, the “real” world is normally more complex and, in many instances, forensic material must be examined for a number of different evidence types.This article summarises the concepts, planning, design, preparation, implementation, co-ordination and evaluation of the 2022 Multidisciplinary Collaborative Exercise (2022-MdCE) covering a range of forensic disciplines, specifically DNA, fingerprint, documents and handwriting.The exercise consisted of a questioned letter with typescript text and a signature. In addition, the letter contained a visible bloody fingermark in the area of the signature, a visible staining in the lower left-hand corner, a latent fingermark and an indented impression.The analysis of the results showed that, in the investigation of the bloody fingermark, the priority was given to the DNA examination. Some critical issues emerged in relation to the biological (DNA)/ink sampling strategies when applied before fingermark visualisation. Another outcome of the exercise has been to demonstrate the importance of indented impressions, which have been underestimated by a significant number of participants. As setters, more in-depth studies are needed to produce consistent samples. This concerns all the disciplined involved but especially DNA and fingermarks.Based on this exercise, it is believed that this approach to testing of forensic disciplines allows the analysis of good practice within the various scientific areas, as well as scrutinising the process and sequence of events for examining the material within a forensic laboratory in the best conservative way for all kind of evidences.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T12:47:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe8d508e7a3f4f8bad0e53da9c7d542b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-871X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:47:26Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Forensic Science International: Synergy
spelling doaj.art-fe8d508e7a3f4f8bad0e53da9c7d542b2024-04-07T04:36:11ZengElsevierForensic Science International: Synergy2589-871X2024-01-018100465ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomesF. Zampa0H. Bandey1A. Bécue2E. Bouzaid3M.J. Branco4J. Buegler5M. Kambosos6S. Kneppers7K. Kriiska-Maiväli8A. Mattei9L. Zatkalikova10Reparto Carabinieri Investigazioni Scientifiche (R.I.S.), Parma, Italy; Corresponding author.Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, SP4 0JQ, UKÉcole des Sciences Criminelles (School of Criminal Justice), University of Lausanne, SwitzerlandService National de Police Scientifique, Laboratoire de Marseille, Division Identification de la Personne, FranceLEDEM - Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, PortugalBavarian State Criminal Police Office, Forensic Science Institute, Munich, GermanyBundeskriminalamt (BKA), Wiesbaden, GermanyDivision of Biological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), the NetherlandsEstonian Forensic Science Institute, Tallinn, EstoniaReparto Carabinieri Investigazioni Scientifiche (R.I.S.), Messina, ItalyInstitute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Interior, SlovakiaThe use of collaborative exercises (CE) and proficiency tests (PT) as part of the governance programme for any forensic science laboratory has become commonplace and recommended by several international organisations. Traditionally these have been discipline-specific exercises testing a laboratory's ability in a single area of forensic science. However, the “real” world is normally more complex and, in many instances, forensic material must be examined for a number of different evidence types.This article summarises the concepts, planning, design, preparation, implementation, co-ordination and evaluation of the 2022 Multidisciplinary Collaborative Exercise (2022-MdCE) covering a range of forensic disciplines, specifically DNA, fingerprint, documents and handwriting.The exercise consisted of a questioned letter with typescript text and a signature. In addition, the letter contained a visible bloody fingermark in the area of the signature, a visible staining in the lower left-hand corner, a latent fingermark and an indented impression.The analysis of the results showed that, in the investigation of the bloody fingermark, the priority was given to the DNA examination. Some critical issues emerged in relation to the biological (DNA)/ink sampling strategies when applied before fingermark visualisation. Another outcome of the exercise has been to demonstrate the importance of indented impressions, which have been underestimated by a significant number of participants. As setters, more in-depth studies are needed to produce consistent samples. This concerns all the disciplined involved but especially DNA and fingermarks.Based on this exercise, it is believed that this approach to testing of forensic disciplines allows the analysis of good practice within the various scientific areas, as well as scrutinising the process and sequence of events for examining the material within a forensic laboratory in the best conservative way for all kind of evidences.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000123MultidisciplinaryCollaborative exerciseForensic scienceSequenceDNAFingermarks
spellingShingle F. Zampa
H. Bandey
A. Bécue
E. Bouzaid
M.J. Branco
J. Buegler
M. Kambosos
S. Kneppers
K. Kriiska-Maiväli
A. Mattei
L. Zatkalikova
ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
Forensic Science International: Synergy
Multidisciplinary
Collaborative exercise
Forensic science
Sequence
DNA
Fingermarks
title ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
title_full ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
title_fullStr ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
title_short ENFSI 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise: organisation and outcomes
title_sort enfsi 2022 multidisciplinary collaborative exercise organisation and outcomes
topic Multidisciplinary
Collaborative exercise
Forensic science
Sequence
DNA
Fingermarks
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000123
work_keys_str_mv AT fzampa enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT hbandey enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT abecue enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT ebouzaid enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT mjbranco enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT jbuegler enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT mkambosos enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT skneppers enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT kkriiskamaivali enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT amattei enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes
AT lzatkalikova enfsi2022multidisciplinarycollaborativeexerciseorganisationandoutcomes