Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application

Abstract To describe the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) applied directly on the eyelids of patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) without corneal shield protector. Observational retrospective single centre study where patients underwent 3 treatment sessions of IPL with 2 ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María C. Martínez-Hergueta, Jorge L. Alió del Barrio, Mario Canto-Cerdan, María A. Amesty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17986-3
_version_ 1811267474496159744
author María C. Martínez-Hergueta
Jorge L. Alió del Barrio
Mario Canto-Cerdan
María A. Amesty
author_facet María C. Martínez-Hergueta
Jorge L. Alió del Barrio
Mario Canto-Cerdan
María A. Amesty
author_sort María C. Martínez-Hergueta
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To describe the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) applied directly on the eyelids of patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) without corneal shield protector. Observational retrospective single centre study where patients underwent 3 treatment sessions of IPL with 2 weeks of interval. The IPL was carried out with Lumenis OPT M22 with a double pass technique of 12 impacts on the infraorbital/lower eyelid region with the 15 × 35 mm guide light (step 1) and a double pass technique of 3 impacts over the upper eyelids with the 8 × 15 mm guide light (step 2). The follow up was conducted through Oculus Keratograph 5 M. 30 patients were enrolled in the study. Although there were no significant differences (p > 0.05), non-invasive tear break-up time, ocular redness, and OSDI questionnaire improved during the 3 IPL sessions. A significant improvement (p = 0.024) in the percentage of meibomian gland loss was also observed. Regarding tear meniscus, it was found similar measurements before and after treatment. No serious adverse effects were reported during the procedure or in subsequent follow-up. Preliminary results suggest that IPL therapy applied directly on the eyelids without corneal shield could be safe and effective in the treatment of MGD.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:03:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fe8ef9fc9c2246de89bb01fab482a626
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:03:11Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-fe8ef9fc9c2246de89bb01fab482a6262022-12-22T03:16:47ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-09-011211710.1038/s41598-022-17986-3Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid applicationMaría C. Martínez-Hergueta0Jorge L. Alió del Barrio1Mario Canto-Cerdan2María A. Amesty3Division of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel HernándezDivision of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel HernándezCornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Unit, Vissum (Miranza Group)Oculoplastic Unit, Vissum (Miranza Group), Instituto Oftalmologico de AlicanteAbstract To describe the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) applied directly on the eyelids of patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) without corneal shield protector. Observational retrospective single centre study where patients underwent 3 treatment sessions of IPL with 2 weeks of interval. The IPL was carried out with Lumenis OPT M22 with a double pass technique of 12 impacts on the infraorbital/lower eyelid region with the 15 × 35 mm guide light (step 1) and a double pass technique of 3 impacts over the upper eyelids with the 8 × 15 mm guide light (step 2). The follow up was conducted through Oculus Keratograph 5 M. 30 patients were enrolled in the study. Although there were no significant differences (p > 0.05), non-invasive tear break-up time, ocular redness, and OSDI questionnaire improved during the 3 IPL sessions. A significant improvement (p = 0.024) in the percentage of meibomian gland loss was also observed. Regarding tear meniscus, it was found similar measurements before and after treatment. No serious adverse effects were reported during the procedure or in subsequent follow-up. Preliminary results suggest that IPL therapy applied directly on the eyelids without corneal shield could be safe and effective in the treatment of MGD.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17986-3
spellingShingle María C. Martínez-Hergueta
Jorge L. Alió del Barrio
Mario Canto-Cerdan
María A. Amesty
Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
Scientific Reports
title Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
title_full Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
title_short Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
title_sort efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light direct eyelid application
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17986-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mariacmartinezhergueta efficacyandsafetyofintensepulsedlightdirecteyelidapplication
AT jorgelaliodelbarrio efficacyandsafetyofintensepulsedlightdirecteyelidapplication
AT mariocantocerdan efficacyandsafetyofintensepulsedlightdirecteyelidapplication
AT mariaaamesty efficacyandsafetyofintensepulsedlightdirecteyelidapplication