Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem
Methods of evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results are prescribed by ISO standards. Ruler is probably one of the most widely used length measuring instrument in the world. For laboratories that plan to be accredited for the calibration of Ruler, the acquisition of a specialized Measuring be...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije)
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Geodetski Vestnik |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://geodetski-vestnik.com/en/clanek/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2024.01.54-68 |
_version_ | 1797219291355938816 |
---|---|
author | Jelena Gučević Siniša Delčev Olivera Vasović Šimšić Miroslav Kuburić Bogdan Šakić |
author_facet | Jelena Gučević Siniša Delčev Olivera Vasović Šimšić Miroslav Kuburić Bogdan Šakić |
author_sort | Jelena Gučević |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Methods of evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results are prescribed by ISO standards. Ruler is probably one of the most widely used length measuring instrument in the world. For laboratories that plan to be accredited for the calibration of Ruler, the acquisition of a specialized Measuring bench is not economically feasible. Confidence in the measured result depends on the measurement uncertainty, and where deficiencies are observed, the values that contribute to the measurement uncertainty should be investigated. This paper describes an interlaboratory comparison for a small number of laboratories on the example of a Measuring bench for calibrating Ruler and indicates the procedure for problem identification; diagnosis of causes; consideration of solutions; initiation of action for improvement and monitoring of the results of applied solutions. The authors documented the problem and listed the elements that contributed to "Unsatisfactory" result in interlaboratory comparisons. They described the actions they took to overcome the "Unsatisfactory" result, analyzed whether the proposed solutions led to "Satisfactory" result and took actions accordingly. The paper presents the results of the international interlaboratory comparison, which are a confirmation of the competence of the personnel, measuring calibration equipment and calibration method. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:31:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-fea6d8e81cd44c5a858e220d33b310b3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0351-0271 1581-1328 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:31:19Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) |
record_format | Article |
series | Geodetski Vestnik |
spelling | doaj.art-fea6d8e81cd44c5a858e220d33b310b32024-04-08T05:58:59ZengAssociation of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije)Geodetski Vestnik0351-02711581-13282024-03-016801546810.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2024.01.54-68Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problemJelena Gučević0Siniša Delčev1Olivera Vasović Šimšić2Miroslav Kuburić3Bogdan Šakić4University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, 24 000 Subotica, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, 24 000 Subotica, SerbiaAcademy of Technical and Art Applied Studies Belgrade, Department School of Civil Engineering, and Geodesy of Applied Studies, 11 000 Belgrade, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, 24 000 Subotica, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, 24 000 Subotica, SerbiaMethods of evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results are prescribed by ISO standards. Ruler is probably one of the most widely used length measuring instrument in the world. For laboratories that plan to be accredited for the calibration of Ruler, the acquisition of a specialized Measuring bench is not economically feasible. Confidence in the measured result depends on the measurement uncertainty, and where deficiencies are observed, the values that contribute to the measurement uncertainty should be investigated. This paper describes an interlaboratory comparison for a small number of laboratories on the example of a Measuring bench for calibrating Ruler and indicates the procedure for problem identification; diagnosis of causes; consideration of solutions; initiation of action for improvement and monitoring of the results of applied solutions. The authors documented the problem and listed the elements that contributed to "Unsatisfactory" result in interlaboratory comparisons. They described the actions they took to overcome the "Unsatisfactory" result, analyzed whether the proposed solutions led to "Satisfactory" result and took actions accordingly. The paper presents the results of the international interlaboratory comparison, which are a confirmation of the competence of the personnel, measuring calibration equipment and calibration method.https://geodetski-vestnik.com/en/clanek/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2024.01.54-68accreditationcalibrationinterlaboratory comparison (ilc)participant laboratoryrulermeasuring linear scalemeasurements uncertainty |
spellingShingle | Jelena Gučević Siniša Delčev Olivera Vasović Šimšić Miroslav Kuburić Bogdan Šakić Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem Geodetski Vestnik accreditation calibration interlaboratory comparison (ilc) participant laboratory ruler measuring linear scale measurements uncertainty |
title | Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
title_full | Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
title_fullStr | Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
title_full_unstemmed | Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
title_short | Interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
title_sort | interlaboratory comparison as a source of information about the problem |
topic | accreditation calibration interlaboratory comparison (ilc) participant laboratory ruler measuring linear scale measurements uncertainty |
url | https://geodetski-vestnik.com/en/clanek/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2024.01.54-68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jelenagucevic interlaboratorycomparisonasasourceofinformationabouttheproblem AT sinisadelcev interlaboratorycomparisonasasourceofinformationabouttheproblem AT oliveravasovicsimsic interlaboratorycomparisonasasourceofinformationabouttheproblem AT miroslavkuburic interlaboratorycomparisonasasourceofinformationabouttheproblem AT bogdansakic interlaboratorycomparisonasasourceofinformationabouttheproblem |