Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators
Abstract Background To tackle noncommunicable disease (NCD) burden globally, two sets of NCD surveillance indicators were established by the World Health Organization: 25 Global Monitoring Framework (GMF) indicators and 10 Progress Monitoring Indicators (PMI). This study aims to assess the data avai...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15165-1 |
| _version_ | 1811165672662630400 |
|---|---|
| author | Bundit Sornpaisarn Yuriko Limmade Supa Pengpid Isareethika Jayasvasti Pheak Chhoun Vathsana Somphet Feisul Idzwan Mustapha Kyaw Kan Kaung Chanatip Chailek Tran Quoc Bao Jürgen Rehm |
| author_facet | Bundit Sornpaisarn Yuriko Limmade Supa Pengpid Isareethika Jayasvasti Pheak Chhoun Vathsana Somphet Feisul Idzwan Mustapha Kyaw Kan Kaung Chanatip Chailek Tran Quoc Bao Jürgen Rehm |
| author_sort | Bundit Sornpaisarn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background To tackle noncommunicable disease (NCD) burden globally, two sets of NCD surveillance indicators were established by the World Health Organization: 25 Global Monitoring Framework (GMF) indicators and 10 Progress Monitoring Indicators (PMI). This study aims to assess the data availability of these two sets of indicators in six ASEAN countries: Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. Methods As data on policy indicators were straightforward and fully available, we focused on studying 25 non-policy indicators: 23 GMFs and 2 PMIs. Gathering data availability of the target indicators was conducted among NCD surveillance experts from the six selected countries during May-June 2020. Our research team found information regarding whether the country had no data at all, was using WHO estimates, was providing ‘expert judgement’ for the data, or had actual data available for each target indicator. We triangulated their answers with several WHO data sources, including the WHO Health Observatory Database and various WHO Global Reports on health behaviours (tobacco, alcohol, diet, and physical activity) and NCDs. We calculated the percentages of the indicators that need improvement by both indicator category and country. Results For all six studied countries, the health-service indicators, based on responses to the facility survey, are the most lacking in data availability (100% of this category’s indicators), followed by the health-service indicators, based on the population survey responses (57%), the mortality and morbidity indicators (50%), the behavioural risk indicators (30%), and the biological risk indicators (7%). The countries that need to improve their NCD surveillance data availability the most are Cambodia (56% of all indicators) and Lao PDR (56%), followed by Malaysia (36%), Vietnam (36%), Myanmar (32%), and Thailand (28%). Conclusion Some of the non-policy GMF and PMI indicators lacked data among the six studied countries. To achieve the global NCDs targets, in the long run, the six countries should collect their own data for all indicators and begin to invest in and implement the facility survey and the population survey to track NCDs-related health services improvements once they have implemented the behavioural and biological Health Risks Population Survey in their countries. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:41:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-feb105ccd61b4de09b744745723863dc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:41:35Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-feb105ccd61b4de09b744745723863dc2023-02-12T12:25:05ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582023-02-012311910.1186/s12889-023-15165-1Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicatorsBundit Sornpaisarn0Yuriko Limmade1Supa Pengpid2Isareethika Jayasvasti3Pheak Chhoun4Vathsana Somphet5Feisul Idzwan Mustapha6Kyaw Kan Kaung7Chanatip Chailek8Tran Quoc Bao9Jürgen Rehm10Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH)Medical Service Department, International SOSFaculty of Public Health, Mahidol UniversityInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol UniversityKHANA Center for Population Health ResearchDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistic, University of Health ScienceDisease Control Division, Ministry of HealthDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health and SportsField Epidemiology Training Program (FETP), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public HealthNon-Communicable Diseases Control Division, General Department of Preventive Medicine, Viet Nam Ministry of HealthInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH)Abstract Background To tackle noncommunicable disease (NCD) burden globally, two sets of NCD surveillance indicators were established by the World Health Organization: 25 Global Monitoring Framework (GMF) indicators and 10 Progress Monitoring Indicators (PMI). This study aims to assess the data availability of these two sets of indicators in six ASEAN countries: Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam. Methods As data on policy indicators were straightforward and fully available, we focused on studying 25 non-policy indicators: 23 GMFs and 2 PMIs. Gathering data availability of the target indicators was conducted among NCD surveillance experts from the six selected countries during May-June 2020. Our research team found information regarding whether the country had no data at all, was using WHO estimates, was providing ‘expert judgement’ for the data, or had actual data available for each target indicator. We triangulated their answers with several WHO data sources, including the WHO Health Observatory Database and various WHO Global Reports on health behaviours (tobacco, alcohol, diet, and physical activity) and NCDs. We calculated the percentages of the indicators that need improvement by both indicator category and country. Results For all six studied countries, the health-service indicators, based on responses to the facility survey, are the most lacking in data availability (100% of this category’s indicators), followed by the health-service indicators, based on the population survey responses (57%), the mortality and morbidity indicators (50%), the behavioural risk indicators (30%), and the biological risk indicators (7%). The countries that need to improve their NCD surveillance data availability the most are Cambodia (56% of all indicators) and Lao PDR (56%), followed by Malaysia (36%), Vietnam (36%), Myanmar (32%), and Thailand (28%). Conclusion Some of the non-policy GMF and PMI indicators lacked data among the six studied countries. To achieve the global NCDs targets, in the long run, the six countries should collect their own data for all indicators and begin to invest in and implement the facility survey and the population survey to track NCDs-related health services improvements once they have implemented the behavioural and biological Health Risks Population Survey in their countries.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15165-1ASEANDataGlobal monitoring FrameworkNCDIndicatorProgress Monitoring Indicator |
| spellingShingle | Bundit Sornpaisarn Yuriko Limmade Supa Pengpid Isareethika Jayasvasti Pheak Chhoun Vathsana Somphet Feisul Idzwan Mustapha Kyaw Kan Kaung Chanatip Chailek Tran Quoc Bao Jürgen Rehm Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators BMC Public Health ASEAN Data Global monitoring Framework NCD Indicator Progress Monitoring Indicator |
| title | Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| title_full | Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| title_fullStr | Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| title_short | Assessing data availability of NCD prevention and control in six ASEAN countries based on WHO global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| title_sort | assessing data availability of ncd prevention and control in six asean countries based on who global monitoring framework and the progress monitor indicators |
| topic | ASEAN Data Global monitoring Framework NCD Indicator Progress Monitoring Indicator |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15165-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bunditsornpaisarn assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT yurikolimmade assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT supapengpid assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT isareethikajayasvasti assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT pheakchhoun assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT vathsanasomphet assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT feisulidzwanmustapha assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT kyawkankaung assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT chanatipchailek assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT tranquocbao assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators AT jurgenrehm assessingdataavailabilityofncdpreventionandcontrolinsixaseancountriesbasedonwhoglobalmonitoringframeworkandtheprogressmonitorindicators |