The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated

The tide gauge record at Brest, France, along Eastern part of Atlantic coast is one of the longest records in Europe spanning 212 years (1807–2019). Analyzing these records has important ramifications in assessing anthropogenic impact of climate change at local and regional scales during this period...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: İz H. Bâki, Shum C.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Geodetic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2020-0124
_version_ 1798040438051962880
author İz H. Bâki
Shum C.K.
author_facet İz H. Bâki
Shum C.K.
author_sort İz H. Bâki
collection DOAJ
description The tide gauge record at Brest, France, along Eastern part of Atlantic coast is one of the longest records in Europe spanning 212 years (1807–2019). Analyzing these records has important ramifications in assessing anthropogenic impact of climate change at local and regional scales during this period. All the previous studies that analyzed Brest’s tide gauge record have used vaguely defined quadratics models and did not incorporate the effect of sea level variations at various frequencies, which confounded the presence or absence of a plausible uniform acceleration. Here, we entertained two competing kinematic models; one with a uniform acceleration representing 212 years of monthly averaged tide gauge data, the other is a two-phase trend model (Phase I is 93 years long and Phase II is 119 years long). Both models include statistically significant (α = 0.05) common periodic effects, and sub and super harmonics of luni-solar origin for representing monthly averaged sea level anomalies observed at Brest. The least squares statistics for both models’ solutions cannot distinguish one model over the other, like earlier studies. However, the assessment of Phase I segment of the records disclosed the absence of a statistically significant trend and a uniform acceleration during this period. This outcome eliminates conclusively the occurrence of a uniform acceleration during the entire 212-year data span of the tide gauge record at Brest, favoring the two-phase trend model as a sound alternative.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:07:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fed0c989e8294ee8a0d20fba88efd69c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2081-9943
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:07:37Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Journal of Geodetic Science
spelling doaj.art-fed0c989e8294ee8a0d20fba88efd69c2022-12-22T04:00:39ZengDe GruyterJournal of Geodetic Science2081-99432021-01-011119510110.1515/jogs-2020-0124The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidatedİz H. Bâki0Shum C.K.1Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USADivision of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USAThe tide gauge record at Brest, France, along Eastern part of Atlantic coast is one of the longest records in Europe spanning 212 years (1807–2019). Analyzing these records has important ramifications in assessing anthropogenic impact of climate change at local and regional scales during this period. All the previous studies that analyzed Brest’s tide gauge record have used vaguely defined quadratics models and did not incorporate the effect of sea level variations at various frequencies, which confounded the presence or absence of a plausible uniform acceleration. Here, we entertained two competing kinematic models; one with a uniform acceleration representing 212 years of monthly averaged tide gauge data, the other is a two-phase trend model (Phase I is 93 years long and Phase II is 119 years long). Both models include statistically significant (α = 0.05) common periodic effects, and sub and super harmonics of luni-solar origin for representing monthly averaged sea level anomalies observed at Brest. The least squares statistics for both models’ solutions cannot distinguish one model over the other, like earlier studies. However, the assessment of Phase I segment of the records disclosed the absence of a statistically significant trend and a uniform acceleration during this period. This outcome eliminates conclusively the occurrence of a uniform acceleration during the entire 212-year data span of the tide gauge record at Brest, favoring the two-phase trend model as a sound alternative.https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2020-0124brest tide gaugemean sea level trenduniform sea level accelerationtwo phase trendclimate change
spellingShingle İz H. Bâki
Shum C.K.
The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
Journal of Geodetic Science
brest tide gauge
mean sea level trend
uniform sea level acceleration
two phase trend
climate change
title The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
title_full The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
title_fullStr The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
title_full_unstemmed The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
title_short The ambiguous sea level rise at Brest’s 212 yearlong record elucidated
title_sort ambiguous sea level rise at brest s 212 yearlong record elucidated
topic brest tide gauge
mean sea level trend
uniform sea level acceleration
two phase trend
climate change
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2020-0124
work_keys_str_mv AT izhbaki theambiguoussealevelriseatbrests212yearlongrecordelucidated
AT shumck theambiguoussealevelriseatbrests212yearlongrecordelucidated
AT izhbaki ambiguoussealevelriseatbrests212yearlongrecordelucidated
AT shumck ambiguoussealevelriseatbrests212yearlongrecordelucidated