Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy

This study aims to optimize the COVID-19 screening strategies under China's dynamic zero-case policy through cost-effectiveness analysis. A total of 9 screening strategies with different screening frequencies and combinations of detection methods were designed. A stochastic agent-based model wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haonan Li, Hui Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099116/full
_version_ 1827951701471002624
author Haonan Li
Haonan Li
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang
author_facet Haonan Li
Haonan Li
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang
author_sort Haonan Li
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to optimize the COVID-19 screening strategies under China's dynamic zero-case policy through cost-effectiveness analysis. A total of 9 screening strategies with different screening frequencies and combinations of detection methods were designed. A stochastic agent-based model was used to simulate the progress of the COVID-19 outbreak in scenario I (close contacts were promptly quarantined) and scenario II (close contacts were not promptly quarantined). The primary outcomes included the number of infections, number of close contacts, number of deaths, the duration of the epidemic, and duration of movement restriction. Net monetary benefit (NMB) and the incremental cost-benefit ratio were used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies. The results indicated that under China's COVID-19 dynamic zero-case policy, high-frequency screening can help contain the spread of the epidemic, reduce the size and burden of the epidemic, and is cost-effective. Mass antigen testing is not cost-effective compared with mass nucleic acid testing in the same screening frequency. It would be more cost-effective to use AT as a supplemental screening tool when NAT capacity is insufficient or when outbreaks are spreading very rapidly.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:46:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fee2aebfcc1b4ba8892a6c10aaba94bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:46:32Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-fee2aebfcc1b4ba8892a6c10aaba94bc2023-05-09T04:47:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652023-05-011110.3389/fpubh.2023.10991161099116Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policyHaonan Li0Haonan Li1Hui Zhang2Hui Zhang3School of Medical Business, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Health Economics and Health Promotion Research Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaSchool of Medical Business, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Health Economics and Health Promotion Research Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThis study aims to optimize the COVID-19 screening strategies under China's dynamic zero-case policy through cost-effectiveness analysis. A total of 9 screening strategies with different screening frequencies and combinations of detection methods were designed. A stochastic agent-based model was used to simulate the progress of the COVID-19 outbreak in scenario I (close contacts were promptly quarantined) and scenario II (close contacts were not promptly quarantined). The primary outcomes included the number of infections, number of close contacts, number of deaths, the duration of the epidemic, and duration of movement restriction. Net monetary benefit (NMB) and the incremental cost-benefit ratio were used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies. The results indicated that under China's COVID-19 dynamic zero-case policy, high-frequency screening can help contain the spread of the epidemic, reduce the size and burden of the epidemic, and is cost-effective. Mass antigen testing is not cost-effective compared with mass nucleic acid testing in the same screening frequency. It would be more cost-effective to use AT as a supplemental screening tool when NAT capacity is insufficient or when outbreaks are spreading very rapidly.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099116/fullCOVID-19cost-effectivenessscreening strategyagent-based modeldynamic zero-case policyChina
spellingShingle Haonan Li
Haonan Li
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang
Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
Frontiers in Public Health
COVID-19
cost-effectiveness
screening strategy
agent-based model
dynamic zero-case policy
China
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 screening strategy under China's dynamic zero-case policy
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of covid 19 screening strategy under china s dynamic zero case policy
topic COVID-19
cost-effectiveness
screening strategy
agent-based model
dynamic zero-case policy
China
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099116/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haonanli costeffectivenessanalysisofcovid19screeningstrategyunderchinasdynamiczerocasepolicy
AT haonanli costeffectivenessanalysisofcovid19screeningstrategyunderchinasdynamiczerocasepolicy
AT huizhang costeffectivenessanalysisofcovid19screeningstrategyunderchinasdynamiczerocasepolicy
AT huizhang costeffectivenessanalysisofcovid19screeningstrategyunderchinasdynamiczerocasepolicy