Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population

This study aimed to investigate a sheeppox outbreak in a highly susceptible naive sheep population in Kharsit village, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. Moreover, to compare commercial sheeppox vaccines, the Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines, as emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atef Oreiby, Ayman S. Seada, Mohamed F. Abou Elazab, Walied Abdo, Mohamed Kassab, Yamen Hegazy, Hazim O. Khalifa, Tetsuya Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/16/2084
_version_ 1797432606982144000
author Atef Oreiby
Ayman S. Seada
Mohamed F. Abou Elazab
Walied Abdo
Mohamed Kassab
Yamen Hegazy
Hazim O. Khalifa
Tetsuya Matsumoto
author_facet Atef Oreiby
Ayman S. Seada
Mohamed F. Abou Elazab
Walied Abdo
Mohamed Kassab
Yamen Hegazy
Hazim O. Khalifa
Tetsuya Matsumoto
author_sort Atef Oreiby
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to investigate a sheeppox outbreak in a highly susceptible naive sheep population in Kharsit village, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. Moreover, to compare commercial sheeppox vaccines, the Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines, as emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. In December 2018, a sheeppox outbreak occurred in a flock of 65 sheep upon the purchase of an apparently healthy ewe from outside the village. This ewe showed a systemic disease with cutaneous lesions after a few days, thereafter more cases began to appear. Cutaneous lesions in other sheep in the flock in the form of macules, papules, and scabs were common in wool-less areas of the body, in addition to fever and respiratory disorders. Postmortem findings revealed the congestion of visceral organs with apparent gross pathology of the lung. Biopsies of cutaneous lesions and visceral organs were collected, and sheeppox was identified by histopathology and transmission electron microscopy, which showed the existence of sheeppox cells and intracytoplasmic brick-shape sheeppox virions. The Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines were used for the emergency vaccination for two different groups of animals and the third group was left as a control group. Serum samples were collected before vaccination as well as 21 days post-vaccination, and serum protein fractionation analysis was performed for all groups. The outbreak ended after 2.5 months, the cumulative incidence was 66.2%, and the overall case fatality was 51.1%. There was significantly higher protection against sheeppox infection and mortalities among RM-65 vaccine immunized group compared to Romanian strain vaccine-immunized animals at <i>p</i> < 0.05. RM-65-vaccinated animals did not show sheeppox cases or mortalities, compared to Romanian strain-vaccinated animals, which had mild pox signs in 78% of animals and case fatality of 35.7%. The serum protein analysis also indicated the superior performance of the RM-65 vaccine; it increased the level of α1-globulin and β-globulin compared to the Romanian strain, which increased the level of β-globulin only. The current study shows a better performance of the tested RM-65 than the Romanian strain vaccine for emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. These findings point to the validity of emergency vaccination against sheeppox and the importance of the comparative field evaluation of vaccines; however, wide-scale studies are required for further evaluation. Future investigation of whether the Romanian strain itself or vaccine-production-related issues are responsible for these findings is required.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:03:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-feec04d06589442ba3416f8de45b81d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:03:03Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-feec04d06589442ba3416f8de45b81d02023-12-01T23:19:00ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-08-011216208410.3390/ani12162084Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible PopulationAtef Oreiby0Ayman S. Seada1Mohamed F. Abou Elazab2Walied Abdo3Mohamed Kassab4Yamen Hegazy5Hazim O. Khalifa6Tetsuya Matsumoto7Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptBacteriology Department, Animal Health Research Institute, Tanta Branch, EgyptDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptPathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptCytology and Histology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptDepartment of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita 286-0048, JapanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita 286-0048, JapanThis study aimed to investigate a sheeppox outbreak in a highly susceptible naive sheep population in Kharsit village, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. Moreover, to compare commercial sheeppox vaccines, the Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines, as emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. In December 2018, a sheeppox outbreak occurred in a flock of 65 sheep upon the purchase of an apparently healthy ewe from outside the village. This ewe showed a systemic disease with cutaneous lesions after a few days, thereafter more cases began to appear. Cutaneous lesions in other sheep in the flock in the form of macules, papules, and scabs were common in wool-less areas of the body, in addition to fever and respiratory disorders. Postmortem findings revealed the congestion of visceral organs with apparent gross pathology of the lung. Biopsies of cutaneous lesions and visceral organs were collected, and sheeppox was identified by histopathology and transmission electron microscopy, which showed the existence of sheeppox cells and intracytoplasmic brick-shape sheeppox virions. The Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines were used for the emergency vaccination for two different groups of animals and the third group was left as a control group. Serum samples were collected before vaccination as well as 21 days post-vaccination, and serum protein fractionation analysis was performed for all groups. The outbreak ended after 2.5 months, the cumulative incidence was 66.2%, and the overall case fatality was 51.1%. There was significantly higher protection against sheeppox infection and mortalities among RM-65 vaccine immunized group compared to Romanian strain vaccine-immunized animals at <i>p</i> < 0.05. RM-65-vaccinated animals did not show sheeppox cases or mortalities, compared to Romanian strain-vaccinated animals, which had mild pox signs in 78% of animals and case fatality of 35.7%. The serum protein analysis also indicated the superior performance of the RM-65 vaccine; it increased the level of α1-globulin and β-globulin compared to the Romanian strain, which increased the level of β-globulin only. The current study shows a better performance of the tested RM-65 than the Romanian strain vaccine for emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. These findings point to the validity of emergency vaccination against sheeppox and the importance of the comparative field evaluation of vaccines; however, wide-scale studies are required for further evaluation. Future investigation of whether the Romanian strain itself or vaccine-production-related issues are responsible for these findings is required.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/16/2084sheeppoxemergency vaccinationEgyptcontroloutbreak
spellingShingle Atef Oreiby
Ayman S. Seada
Mohamed F. Abou Elazab
Walied Abdo
Mohamed Kassab
Yamen Hegazy
Hazim O. Khalifa
Tetsuya Matsumoto
Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
Animals
sheeppox
emergency vaccination
Egypt
control
outbreak
title Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
title_full Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
title_fullStr Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
title_short Emergency Vaccination as a Control Strategy against Sheeppox Outbreak in a Highly Susceptible Population
title_sort emergency vaccination as a control strategy against sheeppox outbreak in a highly susceptible population
topic sheeppox
emergency vaccination
Egypt
control
outbreak
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/16/2084
work_keys_str_mv AT ateforeiby emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT aymansseada emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT mohamedfabouelazab emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT waliedabdo emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT mohamedkassab emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT yamenhegazy emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT hazimokhalifa emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation
AT tetsuyamatsumoto emergencyvaccinationasacontrolstrategyagainstsheeppoxoutbreakinahighlysusceptiblepopulation