The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.

Notable cross-country differences exist in the diffusion of the Covid-19 and in its lethality. Contact patterns in populations, and in particular intergenerational contacts, have been argued to be responsible for the most vulnerable, the elderly, getting infected more often and thus driving up morta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas Sage, Marco Albertini, Stefani Scherer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256036
_version_ 1818902540326010880
author Lucas Sage
Marco Albertini
Stefani Scherer
author_facet Lucas Sage
Marco Albertini
Stefani Scherer
author_sort Lucas Sage
collection DOAJ
description Notable cross-country differences exist in the diffusion of the Covid-19 and in its lethality. Contact patterns in populations, and in particular intergenerational contacts, have been argued to be responsible for the most vulnerable, the elderly, getting infected more often and thus driving up mortality in some context, like in the southern European one. This paper asks a simple question: is it between whom contacts occur that matters or is it simply how many contacts people have? Due to the high number of confounding factors, it is extremely difficult to empirically assess the impact of single network features separately. This is why we rely on a simulation exercise in which we counterfactually manipulate single aspects of countries' age distribution and network structures. We disentangle the contributions of the kind and of the number of contacts while holding constant the age structure. More precisely, we isolate the respective effects of inter-age contact patterns, degree distribution and clustering on the virus propagation across age groups. We use survey data on face-to-face contacts for Great Britain, Italy, and Germany, to reconstruct networks that mirror empirical contact patterns in these three countries. It turns out that the number of social contacts (degree distribution) largely accounts for the higher infection rates of the elderly in the Italian context, while differences in inter-age contacts patterns are only responsible for minor differences. This suggests that policies specifically targeting inter-age contacts would be little effective.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:37:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fef01d8b3e1248f59dd85e01cc0db6da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:37:16Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-fef01d8b3e1248f59dd85e01cc0db6da2022-12-21T20:06:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01168e025603610.1371/journal.pone.0256036The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.Lucas SageMarco AlbertiniStefani SchererNotable cross-country differences exist in the diffusion of the Covid-19 and in its lethality. Contact patterns in populations, and in particular intergenerational contacts, have been argued to be responsible for the most vulnerable, the elderly, getting infected more often and thus driving up mortality in some context, like in the southern European one. This paper asks a simple question: is it between whom contacts occur that matters or is it simply how many contacts people have? Due to the high number of confounding factors, it is extremely difficult to empirically assess the impact of single network features separately. This is why we rely on a simulation exercise in which we counterfactually manipulate single aspects of countries' age distribution and network structures. We disentangle the contributions of the kind and of the number of contacts while holding constant the age structure. More precisely, we isolate the respective effects of inter-age contact patterns, degree distribution and clustering on the virus propagation across age groups. We use survey data on face-to-face contacts for Great Britain, Italy, and Germany, to reconstruct networks that mirror empirical contact patterns in these three countries. It turns out that the number of social contacts (degree distribution) largely accounts for the higher infection rates of the elderly in the Italian context, while differences in inter-age contacts patterns are only responsible for minor differences. This suggests that policies specifically targeting inter-age contacts would be little effective.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256036
spellingShingle Lucas Sage
Marco Albertini
Stefani Scherer
The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
PLoS ONE
title The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
title_full The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
title_fullStr The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
title_full_unstemmed The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
title_short The spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Interage contacts and networks degree distribution.
title_sort spreading of sars cov 2 interage contacts and networks degree distribution
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256036
work_keys_str_mv AT lucassage thespreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution
AT marcoalbertini thespreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution
AT stefanischerer thespreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution
AT lucassage spreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution
AT marcoalbertini spreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution
AT stefanischerer spreadingofsarscov2interagecontactsandnetworksdegreedistribution