Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

Abstract Background The retrospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the opioid-sparing anesthesia and limited side-effects with ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB using programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) or continuous infusion (CI) and standard opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing video...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuefang Zhu, Wei Ye, Jinhong Chen, Jiwen Xiao, Weibing Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02338-z
_version_ 1827764256386318336
author Xuefang Zhu
Wei Ye
Jinhong Chen
Jiwen Xiao
Weibing Zhao
author_facet Xuefang Zhu
Wei Ye
Jinhong Chen
Jiwen Xiao
Weibing Zhao
author_sort Xuefang Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The retrospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the opioid-sparing anesthesia and limited side-effects with ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB using programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) or continuous infusion (CI) and standard opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS). Methods Patients underwent VATS were stratified into either control group or one of the two ESPB groups in a 1:2:2 ratio depending on whether PIB was implemented or not. The primary endpoint was intra- and post-operative opioids consumption over the first 48 h following surgery. Results A total of 180 cases were included in the analysis. Cumulative perioperative opioid administration was found to be significantly different between PIB, CI and control group (both p < 0.001), and between PIB and CI group (p = 0.028). More specifically, the mean was 305.30 ± 51.35 mg, 339.68 ± 56.07 mg and 468.91 ± 79.84 mg in PIB, CI and control group. NRS scores at rest across all postoperative times were comparable in two ESPB groups, while significantly lower than control group, however, scores during exercising at postoperative 3, 6, 12 h were significantly lower in PIB group as compared to CI group. A wider anesthetized dermatomes with PIB was observed at 6, 24 and 48 h as opposed to the CI. The mean of levobupivacaine plasma concentration was significantly lower for PIB at postoperative 0.5, 12, 24 and 48 h after initiation than CI. However, local anesthetic toxicity was not observed in any of the two ESPB groups. Conclusions When US-guided ESPB using PIB was performed preoperatively, it contributed to the minimization of intra- and post-operative opioid consumption due to better analgesia with a wider anesthetic dermatome opposed to conventional CI, whereas, it was also associated with lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity because of lower plasma concentration of levobupivacaine.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:01:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fef1a92ed0104443b4455f22afd3498b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:01:46Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-fef1a92ed0104443b4455f22afd3498b2023-11-12T12:28:12ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532023-11-0123111110.1186/s12871-023-02338-zComparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomyXuefang Zhu0Wei Ye1Jinhong Chen2Jiwen Xiao3Weibing Zhao4Department of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Huan’anDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Huan’anDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Huan’anDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Huan’anDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Huan’anAbstract Background The retrospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the opioid-sparing anesthesia and limited side-effects with ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB using programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) or continuous infusion (CI) and standard opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS). Methods Patients underwent VATS were stratified into either control group or one of the two ESPB groups in a 1:2:2 ratio depending on whether PIB was implemented or not. The primary endpoint was intra- and post-operative opioids consumption over the first 48 h following surgery. Results A total of 180 cases were included in the analysis. Cumulative perioperative opioid administration was found to be significantly different between PIB, CI and control group (both p < 0.001), and between PIB and CI group (p = 0.028). More specifically, the mean was 305.30 ± 51.35 mg, 339.68 ± 56.07 mg and 468.91 ± 79.84 mg in PIB, CI and control group. NRS scores at rest across all postoperative times were comparable in two ESPB groups, while significantly lower than control group, however, scores during exercising at postoperative 3, 6, 12 h were significantly lower in PIB group as compared to CI group. A wider anesthetized dermatomes with PIB was observed at 6, 24 and 48 h as opposed to the CI. The mean of levobupivacaine plasma concentration was significantly lower for PIB at postoperative 0.5, 12, 24 and 48 h after initiation than CI. However, local anesthetic toxicity was not observed in any of the two ESPB groups. Conclusions When US-guided ESPB using PIB was performed preoperatively, it contributed to the minimization of intra- and post-operative opioid consumption due to better analgesia with a wider anesthetic dermatome opposed to conventional CI, whereas, it was also associated with lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity because of lower plasma concentration of levobupivacaine.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02338-zErector spinae plane blockPerioperative analgesiaProgrammed intermittent bolusContinuous infusionVideo-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomyPostoperative recovery quality
spellingShingle Xuefang Zhu
Wei Ye
Jinhong Chen
Jiwen Xiao
Weibing Zhao
Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
BMC Anesthesiology
Erector spinae plane block
Perioperative analgesia
Programmed intermittent bolus
Continuous infusion
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
Postoperative recovery quality
title Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
title_full Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
title_fullStr Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
title_short Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
title_sort comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
topic Erector spinae plane block
Perioperative analgesia
Programmed intermittent bolus
Continuous infusion
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
Postoperative recovery quality
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02338-z
work_keys_str_mv AT xuefangzhu comparativeretrospectivereviewofperioperativeanalgesiausingultrasoundguidedprogrammedintermittenterectorspinaeplaneblockforvideoassistedthoracoscopiclobectomy
AT weiye comparativeretrospectivereviewofperioperativeanalgesiausingultrasoundguidedprogrammedintermittenterectorspinaeplaneblockforvideoassistedthoracoscopiclobectomy
AT jinhongchen comparativeretrospectivereviewofperioperativeanalgesiausingultrasoundguidedprogrammedintermittenterectorspinaeplaneblockforvideoassistedthoracoscopiclobectomy
AT jiwenxiao comparativeretrospectivereviewofperioperativeanalgesiausingultrasoundguidedprogrammedintermittenterectorspinaeplaneblockforvideoassistedthoracoscopiclobectomy
AT weibingzhao comparativeretrospectivereviewofperioperativeanalgesiausingultrasoundguidedprogrammedintermittenterectorspinaeplaneblockforvideoassistedthoracoscopiclobectomy