Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality

BackgroundThe triangle completion test has been used to assess egocentric wayfinding for decades, yet there is little information on its reliability. We developed a virtual reality (VR) based test and investigated whether either test of spatial navigation was reliable.ObjectiveTo examine test-retest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth McLaren, Shikha Chaudhary, Usman Rashid, Shobika Ravindran, Denise Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.945953/full
_version_ 1828154578870206464
author Ruth McLaren
Shikha Chaudhary
Usman Rashid
Shobika Ravindran
Denise Taylor
author_facet Ruth McLaren
Shikha Chaudhary
Usman Rashid
Shobika Ravindran
Denise Taylor
author_sort Ruth McLaren
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe triangle completion test has been used to assess egocentric wayfinding for decades, yet there is little information on its reliability. We developed a virtual reality (VR) based test and investigated whether either test of spatial navigation was reliable.ObjectiveTo examine test-retest reliability of the real-world and VR triangle completion tests. A secondary objective was to examine the usability of the VR based test.Materials and methodsThirty healthy adults aged 18–45 years were recruited to this block randomized study. Participants completed two sessions of triangle completion tests in the real-world and VR on the same day with a break between sessions.ResultsIn both test versions distance from the endpoint and angle of deviation showed poor test-retest reliability (r < 0.5). Distance traveled had moderate reliability in both the real-world and VR tests (r = 0.55 95% CI [0.23, 0.76]; r = 0.66 95% CI [0.4, 0.83, respectively]). The VR triangle test showed poor correlation with the real-world test.ConclusionThe triangle completion test has poor test-retest reliability and demonstrates poor concurrent validity between the real-world and VR. Nevertheless, it was feasible to translate a real-world test of spatial navigation into VR. VR provides opportunities for development of clinically relevant spatial navigation tests in the future.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:42:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff07bee98f6745edb5b135773e2cf906
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:42:01Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-ff07bee98f6745edb5b135773e2cf9062022-12-22T03:58:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612022-08-011610.3389/fnhum.2022.945953945953Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual realityRuth McLarenShikha ChaudharyUsman RashidShobika RavindranDenise TaylorBackgroundThe triangle completion test has been used to assess egocentric wayfinding for decades, yet there is little information on its reliability. We developed a virtual reality (VR) based test and investigated whether either test of spatial navigation was reliable.ObjectiveTo examine test-retest reliability of the real-world and VR triangle completion tests. A secondary objective was to examine the usability of the VR based test.Materials and methodsThirty healthy adults aged 18–45 years were recruited to this block randomized study. Participants completed two sessions of triangle completion tests in the real-world and VR on the same day with a break between sessions.ResultsIn both test versions distance from the endpoint and angle of deviation showed poor test-retest reliability (r < 0.5). Distance traveled had moderate reliability in both the real-world and VR tests (r = 0.55 95% CI [0.23, 0.76]; r = 0.66 95% CI [0.4, 0.83, respectively]). The VR triangle test showed poor correlation with the real-world test.ConclusionThe triangle completion test has poor test-retest reliability and demonstrates poor concurrent validity between the real-world and VR. Nevertheless, it was feasible to translate a real-world test of spatial navigation into VR. VR provides opportunities for development of clinically relevant spatial navigation tests in the future.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.945953/fullspatial navigationvirtual realitytriangle completion testreliabilitynavigationwayfinding
spellingShingle Ruth McLaren
Shikha Chaudhary
Usman Rashid
Shobika Ravindran
Denise Taylor
Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spatial navigation
virtual reality
triangle completion test
reliability
navigation
wayfinding
title Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
title_full Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
title_fullStr Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
title_short Reliability of the triangle completion test in the real-world and in virtual reality
title_sort reliability of the triangle completion test in the real world and in virtual reality
topic spatial navigation
virtual reality
triangle completion test
reliability
navigation
wayfinding
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.945953/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthmclaren reliabilityofthetrianglecompletiontestintherealworldandinvirtualreality
AT shikhachaudhary reliabilityofthetrianglecompletiontestintherealworldandinvirtualreality
AT usmanrashid reliabilityofthetrianglecompletiontestintherealworldandinvirtualreality
AT shobikaravindran reliabilityofthetrianglecompletiontestintherealworldandinvirtualreality
AT denisetaylor reliabilityofthetrianglecompletiontestintherealworldandinvirtualreality