Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review

Intravitreal injection of anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)is commonly used to treat patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the injection alone requires high cost and compliance. Combining micropulse subthreshold laser (MPSL) and anti-VEGF is a new approach to treating DM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parangeni M Lubis, Marcelius P Prabaniswara, Andi Arus Victor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=11;spage=3448;epage=3453;aulast=Lubis
_version_ 1797225861514002432
author Parangeni M Lubis
Marcelius P Prabaniswara
Andi Arus Victor
author_facet Parangeni M Lubis
Marcelius P Prabaniswara
Andi Arus Victor
author_sort Parangeni M Lubis
collection DOAJ
description Intravitreal injection of anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)is commonly used to treat patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the injection alone requires high cost and compliance. Combining micropulse subthreshold laser (MPSL) and anti-VEGF is a new approach to treating DME. This study intended to answer the question of whether MPSL plus anti-VEGF is effective compared to anti-VEGF alone. The following terms were used in PubMed, clinicaltrial.gov, and Google Scholar: anti-VEGF, DME, MPSL, and diabetic retinopathy. All studies of DME comparing the intervention of MPSL plus anti-VEGF and VEGF alone between the years 2017–2021 were included. Studies with no comparison between the intervention and control group, abstract-only papers, case reports, case series, and systematic review studies were excluded. Five Randomized Controlled Trial (RCTs) and three retrospective studies were analyzed. Four studies found that best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in both therapies. Central macular thickness in six studies was also improved. The improvement differences between both therapies were insignificant and the number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower in combination therapy. These studies show equal outcomes of both therapies. The reduced number of anti-VEGF injections of the combination therapy could improve the management of DME in terms of cost-effectiveness. Further analysis should be conducted to pool the data from the studies and evaluate the overall outcome.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T14:15:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff32ce221afc401884ed6c3bfc2b9945
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:15:44Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-ff32ce221afc401884ed6c3bfc2b99452024-04-03T08:54:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892023-01-0171113448345310.4103/IJO.IJO_519_23Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic reviewParangeni M LubisMarcelius P PrabaniswaraAndi Arus VictorIntravitreal injection of anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)is commonly used to treat patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). However, the injection alone requires high cost and compliance. Combining micropulse subthreshold laser (MPSL) and anti-VEGF is a new approach to treating DME. This study intended to answer the question of whether MPSL plus anti-VEGF is effective compared to anti-VEGF alone. The following terms were used in PubMed, clinicaltrial.gov, and Google Scholar: anti-VEGF, DME, MPSL, and diabetic retinopathy. All studies of DME comparing the intervention of MPSL plus anti-VEGF and VEGF alone between the years 2017–2021 were included. Studies with no comparison between the intervention and control group, abstract-only papers, case reports, case series, and systematic review studies were excluded. Five Randomized Controlled Trial (RCTs) and three retrospective studies were analyzed. Four studies found that best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in both therapies. Central macular thickness in six studies was also improved. The improvement differences between both therapies were insignificant and the number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly lower in combination therapy. These studies show equal outcomes of both therapies. The reduced number of anti-VEGF injections of the combination therapy could improve the management of DME in terms of cost-effectiveness. Further analysis should be conducted to pool the data from the studies and evaluate the overall outcome.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=11;spage=3448;epage=3453;aulast=Lubisanti-vegfdiabetic macular edemamicropulse laser
spellingShingle Parangeni M Lubis
Marcelius P Prabaniswara
Andi Arus Victor
Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
anti-vegf
diabetic macular edema
micropulse laser
title Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
title_full Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
title_fullStr Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
title_short Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review
title_sort comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti vegf versus anti vegf alone in diabetic macular edema systematic review
topic anti-vegf
diabetic macular edema
micropulse laser
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=11;spage=3448;epage=3453;aulast=Lubis
work_keys_str_mv AT parangenimlubis comparisonofmicropulsesubthresholdlaserplusantivegfversusantivegfaloneindiabeticmacularedemasystematicreview
AT marceliuspprabaniswara comparisonofmicropulsesubthresholdlaserplusantivegfversusantivegfaloneindiabeticmacularedemasystematicreview
AT andiarusvictor comparisonofmicropulsesubthresholdlaserplusantivegfversusantivegfaloneindiabeticmacularedemasystematicreview