Succinct Cancer Clinical Trial Consent Forms in Rural Patients With Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blinded study
Rural patients are often underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is a secondary analysis of a study that tested short (2000 word) versus long (6000 word) consent forms with a focus on rurality. Among 240 patients, 89 (37%) were rural. Seventy-one (80%) rural and 117 (77%) nonrural patients...
Main Authors: | Jana Wieland MD, Daniel Satele BS, Yahya Almodallal MBBS, Paul Novotny MS, Stephanie L. Pritzl MD, Sumithra J. Mandrekar PhD, Aminah Jatoi MD |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Patient Experience |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221107242 |
Similar Items
-
Physician-Reported Experience and Understanding of Adverse Event Attribution in Cancer Clinical Trials
by: Jennifer G. Le-Rademacher, PhD, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
On the Succinctness of Atoms of Dependency
by: Martin Lück, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Adverse Event Burden Score—A Versatile Summary Measure for Cancer Clinical Trials
by: Jennifer G. Le-Rademacher, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Approximating Succinct MaxSat.
by: Schallhart, C, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Succinct Computational Secret Sharing
by: Applebaum, Benny, et al.
Published: (2023)