Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"

Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meimanat Hosseini, Farideh Yaghmaei, Safieh Hosseinzade, Hamid Alavi Majd, Parvin Sarbakhsh, Mahmoud Tavousi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research 2012-12-01
Series:Payesh
Subjects:
Online Access:http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.html
_version_ 1819007897686769664
author Meimanat Hosseini
Farideh Yaghmaei
Safieh Hosseinzade
Hamid Alavi Majd
Parvin Sarbakhsh
Mahmoud Tavousi
author_facet Meimanat Hosseini
Farideh Yaghmaei
Safieh Hosseinzade
Hamid Alavi Majd
Parvin Sarbakhsh
Mahmoud Tavousi
author_sort Meimanat Hosseini
collection DOAJ
description Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and reliability with participating of612people. For the purposes of study, the questionnaire was translated. At first stage of the psychometric evaluation, content validity of the questionnaire was measured by Waltz and Bussel content validity index. In order to the evaluating reliability, for determining the external stability of this instrument, test-retest and inter class correlation coefficient were used and for determining the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. Construct validity indexes were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis.Results: Findings showed that internal correlation coefficient (Alpha Cronbach) was 0.95 for 'health promotion lifestyle profile 2’. Inter class correlation coefficient for the instrument subscales were between 0.67-0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity of the index, fitted χ2 was equal to 2.58, the RMSEA index was equal to 0.05, GFI index equal to 0.83, and CFI index was equal to 0.95, respectively.Conclusion: There is high correlation between the total score of "Health promotion lifestyle profile 2" and its subscale scores.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:31:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff4235a55feb4a3489e36f16e2fe0584
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7626
2008-4536
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:31:53Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research
record_format Article
series Payesh
spelling doaj.art-ff4235a55feb4a3489e36f16e2fe05842022-12-21T19:21:53ZfasIranian Institute for Health Sciences ResearchPayesh1680-76262008-45362012-12-01116849856Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"Meimanat Hosseini0Farideh Yaghmaei1Safieh Hosseinzade2Hamid Alavi Majd3Parvin Sarbakhsh4Mahmoud Tavousi5 Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and reliability with participating of612people. For the purposes of study, the questionnaire was translated. At first stage of the psychometric evaluation, content validity of the questionnaire was measured by Waltz and Bussel content validity index. In order to the evaluating reliability, for determining the external stability of this instrument, test-retest and inter class correlation coefficient were used and for determining the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. Construct validity indexes were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis.Results: Findings showed that internal correlation coefficient (Alpha Cronbach) was 0.95 for 'health promotion lifestyle profile 2’. Inter class correlation coefficient for the instrument subscales were between 0.67-0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity of the index, fitted χ2 was equal to 2.58, the RMSEA index was equal to 0.05, GFI index equal to 0.83, and CFI index was equal to 0.95, respectively.Conclusion: There is high correlation between the total score of "Health promotion lifestyle profile 2" and its subscale scores.http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.htmlhealth promoting life style profile 2construct validitypsychometric evaluation
spellingShingle Meimanat Hosseini
Farideh Yaghmaei
Safieh Hosseinzade
Hamid Alavi Majd
Parvin Sarbakhsh
Mahmoud Tavousi
Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
Payesh
health promoting life style profile 2
construct validity
psychometric evaluation
title Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
title_full Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
title_short Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the health promoting life style profile 2
topic health promoting life style profile 2
construct validity
psychometric evaluation
url http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT meimanathosseini psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2
AT faridehyaghmaei psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2
AT safiehhosseinzade psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2
AT hamidalavimajd psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2
AT parvinsarbakhsh psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2
AT mahmoudtavousi psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2