Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"
Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and re...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Payesh |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.html |
_version_ | 1819007897686769664 |
---|---|
author | Meimanat Hosseini Farideh Yaghmaei Safieh Hosseinzade Hamid Alavi Majd Parvin Sarbakhsh Mahmoud Tavousi |
author_facet | Meimanat Hosseini Farideh Yaghmaei Safieh Hosseinzade Hamid Alavi Majd Parvin Sarbakhsh Mahmoud Tavousi |
author_sort | Meimanat Hosseini |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and reliability with participating of612people. For the purposes of study, the questionnaire was translated. At first stage of the psychometric evaluation, content validity of the questionnaire was measured by Waltz and Bussel content validity index. In order to the evaluating reliability, for determining the external stability of this instrument, test-retest and inter class correlation coefficient were used and for determining the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. Construct validity indexes were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis.Results: Findings showed that internal correlation coefficient (Alpha Cronbach) was 0.95 for 'health promotion lifestyle profile 2’. Inter class correlation coefficient for the instrument subscales were between 0.67-0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity of the index, fitted χ2 was equal to 2.58, the RMSEA index was equal to 0.05, GFI index equal to 0.83, and CFI index was equal to 0.95, respectively.Conclusion: There is high correlation between the total score of "Health promotion lifestyle profile 2" and its subscale scores. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T00:31:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ff4235a55feb4a3489e36f16e2fe0584 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1680-7626 2008-4536 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T00:31:53Z |
publishDate | 2012-12-01 |
publisher | Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research |
record_format | Article |
series | Payesh |
spelling | doaj.art-ff4235a55feb4a3489e36f16e2fe05842022-12-21T19:21:53ZfasIranian Institute for Health Sciences ResearchPayesh1680-76262008-45362012-12-01116849856Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2"Meimanat Hosseini0Farideh Yaghmaei1Safieh Hosseinzade2Hamid Alavi Majd3Parvin Sarbakhsh4Mahmoud Tavousi5 Objective (s): The goal of this study was to translate and to evaluate Psychometrically of Iranian version of ‘Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2’.Methods: This methodological survey was conducted in 2011 in 3 health centers in Tehran for estimating the construct validity, content validity and reliability with participating of612people. For the purposes of study, the questionnaire was translated. At first stage of the psychometric evaluation, content validity of the questionnaire was measured by Waltz and Bussel content validity index. In order to the evaluating reliability, for determining the external stability of this instrument, test-retest and inter class correlation coefficient were used and for determining the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. Construct validity indexes were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis.Results: Findings showed that internal correlation coefficient (Alpha Cronbach) was 0.95 for 'health promotion lifestyle profile 2’. Inter class correlation coefficient for the instrument subscales were between 0.67-0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity of the index, fitted χ2 was equal to 2.58, the RMSEA index was equal to 0.05, GFI index equal to 0.83, and CFI index was equal to 0.95, respectively.Conclusion: There is high correlation between the total score of "Health promotion lifestyle profile 2" and its subscale scores.http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.htmlhealth promoting life style profile 2construct validitypsychometric evaluation |
spellingShingle | Meimanat Hosseini Farideh Yaghmaei Safieh Hosseinzade Hamid Alavi Majd Parvin Sarbakhsh Mahmoud Tavousi Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" Payesh health promoting life style profile 2 construct validity psychometric evaluation |
title | Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" |
title_full | Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" |
title_fullStr | Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" |
title_short | Psychometric evaluation of the "Health Promoting Life Style Profile 2" |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the health promoting life style profile 2 |
topic | health promoting life style profile 2 construct validity psychometric evaluation |
url | http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-404-en.html |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meimanathosseini psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 AT faridehyaghmaei psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 AT safiehhosseinzade psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 AT hamidalavimajd psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 AT parvinsarbakhsh psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 AT mahmoudtavousi psychometricevaluationofthehealthpromotinglifestyleprofile2 |