The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent

STING, <i>Tmem173</i>, is involved in liver injury caused by both infectious and sterile inflammatory models. Its role in toxic liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), however, is less clear. While a few groups have investigated its role in NAFLD pathogenesis, results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Siao, Dounia Le Guillou, Jacquelyn J. Maher, Caroline C. Duwaerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/19/4029
_version_ 1797477626224312320
author Kevin Siao
Dounia Le Guillou
Jacquelyn J. Maher
Caroline C. Duwaerts
author_facet Kevin Siao
Dounia Le Guillou
Jacquelyn J. Maher
Caroline C. Duwaerts
author_sort Kevin Siao
collection DOAJ
description STING, <i>Tmem173</i>, is involved in liver injury caused by both infectious and sterile inflammatory models. Its role in toxic liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), however, is less clear. While a few groups have investigated its role in NAFLD pathogenesis, results have been conflicting. The objective of this study was to clarify the exact role of STING in toxic liver injury and NAFLD models. Goldenticket mice (<i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i>), which lack STING protein, were subjected to either a toxic liver injury with tunicamycin (TM) or one of two dietary models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: high fructose feeding or Fructose-Palmitate-Cholesterol (FPC) feeding. Three days after TM injection, <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice demonstrated less liver injury (average ALT of 54 ± 5 IU/L) than control mice (average ALT 108 ± 24 IU/L). In contrast, no significant differences in liver injury were seen between WT and <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice fed either high fructose or FPC. <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice only distinguished themselves from WT mice in their increased insulin resistance. In conclusion, while STING appears to play a role in toxic liver injury mediated by TM, it plays little to no role in two dietary models of NAFLD. The exact role of STING appears to be stimulus-dependent.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:20:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff478c1b319f4986a799cc6b5553f655
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:20:23Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-ff478c1b319f4986a799cc6b5553f6552023-11-23T21:24:21ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432022-09-011419402910.3390/nu14194029The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-DependentKevin Siao0Dounia Le Guillou1Jacquelyn J. Maher2Caroline C. Duwaerts3Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USASTING, <i>Tmem173</i>, is involved in liver injury caused by both infectious and sterile inflammatory models. Its role in toxic liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), however, is less clear. While a few groups have investigated its role in NAFLD pathogenesis, results have been conflicting. The objective of this study was to clarify the exact role of STING in toxic liver injury and NAFLD models. Goldenticket mice (<i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i>), which lack STING protein, were subjected to either a toxic liver injury with tunicamycin (TM) or one of two dietary models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: high fructose feeding or Fructose-Palmitate-Cholesterol (FPC) feeding. Three days after TM injection, <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice demonstrated less liver injury (average ALT of 54 ± 5 IU/L) than control mice (average ALT 108 ± 24 IU/L). In contrast, no significant differences in liver injury were seen between WT and <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice fed either high fructose or FPC. <i>Tmem173<sup>gt</sup></i> mice only distinguished themselves from WT mice in their increased insulin resistance. In conclusion, while STING appears to play a role in toxic liver injury mediated by TM, it plays little to no role in two dietary models of NAFLD. The exact role of STING appears to be stimulus-dependent.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/19/4029NASHSTINGFPC dietinsulin resistancetoxic liver injury
spellingShingle Kevin Siao
Dounia Le Guillou
Jacquelyn J. Maher
Caroline C. Duwaerts
The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
Nutrients
NASH
STING
FPC diet
insulin resistance
toxic liver injury
title The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
title_full The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
title_fullStr The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
title_full_unstemmed The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
title_short The Role of STING in Liver Injury Is Both Stimulus- and Time-Dependent
title_sort role of sting in liver injury is both stimulus and time dependent
topic NASH
STING
FPC diet
insulin resistance
toxic liver injury
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/19/4029
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinsiao theroleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT dounialeguillou theroleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT jacquelynjmaher theroleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT carolinecduwaerts theroleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT kevinsiao roleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT dounialeguillou roleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT jacquelynjmaher roleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent
AT carolinecduwaerts roleofstinginliverinjuryisbothstimulusandtimedependent