An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation

Abstract Power delivery with high reliability is one of the main objectives of any distribution system. In this regard, system operators are adapting the traditional distribution systems with sectionalized switches and optimal preventive maintenance (PM) scheduling techniques as two effective method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Alizadeh, Innocent Kamwa, Ali Moeini, Seyed Masoud Mohseni‐Bonab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12625
_version_ 1828333019456339968
author Ali Alizadeh
Innocent Kamwa
Ali Moeini
Seyed Masoud Mohseni‐Bonab
author_facet Ali Alizadeh
Innocent Kamwa
Ali Moeini
Seyed Masoud Mohseni‐Bonab
author_sort Ali Alizadeh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Power delivery with high reliability is one of the main objectives of any distribution system. In this regard, system operators are adapting the traditional distribution systems with sectionalized switches and optimal preventive maintenance (PM) scheduling techniques as two effective methods for reliability improvement. However, they suffer due to the lack of a practical model in which switch placement (SP) and PM scheduling problems are considered simultaneously. Furthermore, consideration of incentive regulation schemes, such as reward‐penalty scheme (RPS) is highly questionable in the separated reliability improvement problems. In this paper, a mix‐integer linear programming model is presented wherein both SP and PM scheduling problems are considered. Rather than using conventional methods for linearization, an exact formulation is proposed to avoid the impact of approximations on the final decision. Moreover, RPS is also regarded as an incentive regulation scheme to balance the reliability level and financial performance. The results of test and real network implementation confirm that a higher performance is reached in terms of reliability and financial issues when the proposed model is utilized compared to the other ones. Besides, analysis demonstrates that the proposed model behaves effectively in both mid and long terms.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:13:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff4bcef1813d4ee490c72be54b6c0287
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-8687
1751-8695
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:13:42Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
spelling doaj.art-ff4bcef1813d4ee490c72be54b6c02872022-12-22T02:29:46ZengWileyIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution1751-86871751-86952022-12-0116234672468810.1049/gtd2.12625An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulationAli Alizadeh0Innocent Kamwa1Ali Moeini2Seyed Masoud Mohseni‐Bonab3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Laval University Québec CanadaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Laval University Québec CanadaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Laval University Québec CanadaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Laval University Québec CanadaAbstract Power delivery with high reliability is one of the main objectives of any distribution system. In this regard, system operators are adapting the traditional distribution systems with sectionalized switches and optimal preventive maintenance (PM) scheduling techniques as two effective methods for reliability improvement. However, they suffer due to the lack of a practical model in which switch placement (SP) and PM scheduling problems are considered simultaneously. Furthermore, consideration of incentive regulation schemes, such as reward‐penalty scheme (RPS) is highly questionable in the separated reliability improvement problems. In this paper, a mix‐integer linear programming model is presented wherein both SP and PM scheduling problems are considered. Rather than using conventional methods for linearization, an exact formulation is proposed to avoid the impact of approximations on the final decision. Moreover, RPS is also regarded as an incentive regulation scheme to balance the reliability level and financial performance. The results of test and real network implementation confirm that a higher performance is reached in terms of reliability and financial issues when the proposed model is utilized compared to the other ones. Besides, analysis demonstrates that the proposed model behaves effectively in both mid and long terms.https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12625
spellingShingle Ali Alizadeh
Innocent Kamwa
Ali Moeini
Seyed Masoud Mohseni‐Bonab
An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
title An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
title_full An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
title_fullStr An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
title_full_unstemmed An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
title_short An exact MILP model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
title_sort exact milp model for joint switch placement and preventive maintenance scheduling considering incentive regulation
url https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12625
work_keys_str_mv AT alializadeh anexactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT innocentkamwa anexactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT alimoeini anexactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT seyedmasoudmohsenibonab anexactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT alializadeh exactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT innocentkamwa exactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT alimoeini exactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation
AT seyedmasoudmohsenibonab exactmilpmodelforjointswitchplacementandpreventivemaintenanceschedulingconsideringincentiveregulation