Biases in the experimental annotations of protein function and their effect on our understanding of protein function space.
The ongoing functional annotation of proteins relies upon the work of curators to capture experimental findings from scientific literature and apply them to protein sequence and structure data. However, with the increasing use of high-throughput experimental assays, a small number of experimental st...
Main Authors: | Alexandra M Schnoes, David C Ream, Alexander W Thorman, Patricia C Babbitt, Iddo Friedberg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23737737/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies.
by: Alexandra M Schnoes, et al.
Published: (2009-12-01) -
New computational approaches to understanding molecular protein function.
by: Jacquelyn S Fetrow, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Clustering the annotation space of proteins
by: Ouzounis Christos A, et al.
Published: (2005-02-01) -
The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens
by: Naihui Zhou, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
by: Kokulapalan Wimalanathan, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)