Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions

Abstract Background To compare the effect and outcomes of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided rotational atherectomy (RA) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided RA in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Methods Data of calcified coronary lesions treated with RA that underwent OCT...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Weili Teng, Qi Li, Yuliang Ma, Chengfu Cao, Jian Liu, Hong Zhao, Mingyu Lu, Chang Hou, Weimin Wang
Materiálatiipa: Artihkal
Giella:English
Almmustuhtton: BMC 2021-06-01
Ráidu:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02103-5
_version_ 1830200217962545152
author Weili Teng
Qi Li
Yuliang Ma
Chengfu Cao
Jian Liu
Hong Zhao
Mingyu Lu
Chang Hou
Weimin Wang
author_facet Weili Teng
Qi Li
Yuliang Ma
Chengfu Cao
Jian Liu
Hong Zhao
Mingyu Lu
Chang Hou
Weimin Wang
author_sort Weili Teng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To compare the effect and outcomes of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided rotational atherectomy (RA) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided RA in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Methods Data of calcified coronary lesions treated with RA that underwent OCT-guided or IVUS-guided from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. The effect and outcomes between underwent OCT-guided RA and IVUS-guided RA were compared. Results A total of 33 lesions in 32 patients received OCT-guided RA and 51 lesions in 47 patients received IVUS-guided RA. There was no significant difference between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group in clinical baselines characteristics. Comparing the procedural and lesions characteristics of the two groups, the contrast volume was larger [(348.8 ± 110.6) ml vs. (275.2 ± 76.8) ml, P = 0.002] and the scoring balloon was more frequently performed (33.3% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001) after RA and before stenting in the OCT-guided RA group. Comparing the intravascular imaging findings of the two groups, stent expansion was significantly larger in the OCT-guided RA group ([82 ± 8]% vs. [75 ± 9]%, P = 0.001). Both groups achieved procedural success immediately. There were no significantly differences in the incidence of complications. Although there was no statistical difference in the occurrence of MACE at 1 year between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group (3.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.517), no cardiovascular death, TVR and stent thrombosis occurred in OCT-guided RA group. Conclusions OCT-guided RA compared to IVUS-guided RA for treating calcified coronary lesions resulted in better stent expansion and may have improved prognosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T02:30:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff7d8961f8174c369f27ee630814546a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2261
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T02:30:06Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
spelling doaj.art-ff7d8961f8174c369f27ee630814546a2022-12-21T21:23:55ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612021-06-012111910.1186/s12872-021-02103-5Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesionsWeili Teng0Qi Li1Yuliang Ma2Chengfu Cao3Jian Liu4Hong Zhao5Mingyu Lu6Chang Hou7Weimin Wang8Department of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University People’s HospitalAbstract Background To compare the effect and outcomes of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided rotational atherectomy (RA) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided RA in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Methods Data of calcified coronary lesions treated with RA that underwent OCT-guided or IVUS-guided from January 2016 to December 2019 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. The effect and outcomes between underwent OCT-guided RA and IVUS-guided RA were compared. Results A total of 33 lesions in 32 patients received OCT-guided RA and 51 lesions in 47 patients received IVUS-guided RA. There was no significant difference between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group in clinical baselines characteristics. Comparing the procedural and lesions characteristics of the two groups, the contrast volume was larger [(348.8 ± 110.6) ml vs. (275.2 ± 76.8) ml, P = 0.002] and the scoring balloon was more frequently performed (33.3% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001) after RA and before stenting in the OCT-guided RA group. Comparing the intravascular imaging findings of the two groups, stent expansion was significantly larger in the OCT-guided RA group ([82 ± 8]% vs. [75 ± 9]%, P = 0.001). Both groups achieved procedural success immediately. There were no significantly differences in the incidence of complications. Although there was no statistical difference in the occurrence of MACE at 1 year between OCT-guided RA group and IVUS-guided RA group (3.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.517), no cardiovascular death, TVR and stent thrombosis occurred in OCT-guided RA group. Conclusions OCT-guided RA compared to IVUS-guided RA for treating calcified coronary lesions resulted in better stent expansion and may have improved prognosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02103-5Optical coherence tomographyIntravascular ultrasoundCalcified lesionsRotational atherectomy
spellingShingle Weili Teng
Qi Li
Yuliang Ma
Chengfu Cao
Jian Liu
Hong Zhao
Mingyu Lu
Chang Hou
Weimin Wang
Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Optical coherence tomography
Intravascular ultrasound
Calcified lesions
Rotational atherectomy
title Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
title_full Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
title_fullStr Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
title_short Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
title_sort comparison of optical coherence tomography guided and intravascular ultrasound guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
topic Optical coherence tomography
Intravascular ultrasound
Calcified lesions
Rotational atherectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02103-5
work_keys_str_mv AT weiliteng comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT qili comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT yuliangma comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT chengfucao comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT jianliu comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT hongzhao comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT mingyulu comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT changhou comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions
AT weiminwang comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographyguidedandintravascularultrasoundguidedrotationalatherectomyforcalcifiedcoronarylesions