Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey
Background The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. Objective This study aimed to explore psychiatrists’ opinions about the potential impact innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psyc...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Digital Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620968355 |
| _version_ | 1828346616193482752 |
|---|---|
| author | C Blease C Locher M Leon-Carlyle M Doraiswamy |
| author_facet | C Blease C Locher M Leon-Carlyle M Doraiswamy |
| author_sort | C Blease |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. Objective This study aimed to explore psychiatrists’ opinions about the potential impact innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice Methods In Spring 2019, we conducted a web-based survey of 791 psychiatrists from 22 countries worldwide. The survey measured opinions about the likelihood future technology would fully replace physicians in performing ten key psychiatric tasks. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses (“comments”) to three open-ended questions in the survey. Results Comments were classified into four major categories in relation to the impact of future technology on: (1) patient-psychiatrist interactions; (2) the quality of patient medical care; (3) the profession of psychiatry; and (4) health systems. Overwhelmingly, psychiatrists were skeptical that technology could replace human empathy. Many predicted that ‘man and machine’ would increasingly collaborate in undertaking clinical decisions, with mixed opinions about the benefits and harms of such an arrangement. Participants were optimistic that technology might improve efficiencies and access to care, and reduce costs. Ethical and regulatory considerations received limited attention. Conclusions This study presents timely information on psychiatrists’ views about the scope of artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice. Psychiatrists expressed divergent views about the value and impact of future technology with worrying omissions about practice guidelines, and ethical and regulatory issues. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T00:28:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ff7f3c24309e45efa114a06f4009af45 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2055-2076 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T00:28:53Z |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Digital Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-ff7f3c24309e45efa114a06f4009af452022-12-22T02:22:37ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762020-10-01610.1177/2055207620968355Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician surveyC BleaseC LocherM Leon-CarlyleM DoraiswamyBackground The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. Objective This study aimed to explore psychiatrists’ opinions about the potential impact innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice Methods In Spring 2019, we conducted a web-based survey of 791 psychiatrists from 22 countries worldwide. The survey measured opinions about the likelihood future technology would fully replace physicians in performing ten key psychiatric tasks. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses (“comments”) to three open-ended questions in the survey. Results Comments were classified into four major categories in relation to the impact of future technology on: (1) patient-psychiatrist interactions; (2) the quality of patient medical care; (3) the profession of psychiatry; and (4) health systems. Overwhelmingly, psychiatrists were skeptical that technology could replace human empathy. Many predicted that ‘man and machine’ would increasingly collaborate in undertaking clinical decisions, with mixed opinions about the benefits and harms of such an arrangement. Participants were optimistic that technology might improve efficiencies and access to care, and reduce costs. Ethical and regulatory considerations received limited attention. Conclusions This study presents timely information on psychiatrists’ views about the scope of artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice. Psychiatrists expressed divergent views about the value and impact of future technology with worrying omissions about practice guidelines, and ethical and regulatory issues.https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620968355 |
| spellingShingle | C Blease C Locher M Leon-Carlyle M Doraiswamy Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey Digital Health |
| title | Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| title_full | Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| title_short | Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| title_sort | artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry qualitative findings from a global physician survey |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620968355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cblease artificialintelligenceandthefutureofpsychiatryqualitativefindingsfromaglobalphysiciansurvey AT clocher artificialintelligenceandthefutureofpsychiatryqualitativefindingsfromaglobalphysiciansurvey AT mleoncarlyle artificialintelligenceandthefutureofpsychiatryqualitativefindingsfromaglobalphysiciansurvey AT mdoraiswamy artificialintelligenceandthefutureofpsychiatryqualitativefindingsfromaglobalphysiciansurvey |