Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach

Background: The detrimental impact of fluid overload (FO) on intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality is well known. However, research to identify subgroups of patients particularly prone to fluid overload is scarce. The aim of this cohort study was to derive “FO phenotypes” in the critical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna S. Messmer, Michel Moser, Patrick Zuercher, Joerg C. Schefold, Martin Müller, Carmen A. Pfortmueller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/2/336
_version_ 1797493071792832512
author Anna S. Messmer
Michel Moser
Patrick Zuercher
Joerg C. Schefold
Martin Müller
Carmen A. Pfortmueller
author_facet Anna S. Messmer
Michel Moser
Patrick Zuercher
Joerg C. Schefold
Martin Müller
Carmen A. Pfortmueller
author_sort Anna S. Messmer
collection DOAJ
description Background: The detrimental impact of fluid overload (FO) on intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality is well known. However, research to identify subgroups of patients particularly prone to fluid overload is scarce. The aim of this cohort study was to derive “FO phenotypes” in the critically ill by using machine learning techniques. Methods: Retrospective single center study including adult intensive care patients with a length of stay of ≥3 days and sufficient data to compute FO. Data was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, fast and frugal trees (FFT), classification decision trees (DT), and a random forest (RF) model. Results: Out of 1772 included patients, 387 (21.8%) met the FO definition. The random forest model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.86), followed by multivariable logistic regression (0.81, 95% CI 0.77–0.86), FFT (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.79) and DT (0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.78) to predict FO. The most important predictors identified in all models were lactate and bicarbonate at admission and postsurgical ICU admission. Sepsis/septic shock was identified as a risk factor in the MV and RF analysis. Conclusion: The FO phenotypes consist of patients admitted after surgery or with sepsis/septic shock with high lactate and low bicarbonate.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:14:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff8ae451e30f47e895c4ac87a5f6c0f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:14:45Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ff8ae451e30f47e895c4ac87a5f6c0f42023-11-23T14:12:17ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-01-0111233610.3390/jcm11020336Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning ApproachAnna S. Messmer0Michel Moser1Patrick Zuercher2Joerg C. Schefold3Martin Müller4Carmen A. Pfortmueller5Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandBackground: The detrimental impact of fluid overload (FO) on intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality is well known. However, research to identify subgroups of patients particularly prone to fluid overload is scarce. The aim of this cohort study was to derive “FO phenotypes” in the critically ill by using machine learning techniques. Methods: Retrospective single center study including adult intensive care patients with a length of stay of ≥3 days and sufficient data to compute FO. Data was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, fast and frugal trees (FFT), classification decision trees (DT), and a random forest (RF) model. Results: Out of 1772 included patients, 387 (21.8%) met the FO definition. The random forest model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.86), followed by multivariable logistic regression (0.81, 95% CI 0.77–0.86), FFT (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.79) and DT (0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.78) to predict FO. The most important predictors identified in all models were lactate and bicarbonate at admission and postsurgical ICU admission. Sepsis/septic shock was identified as a risk factor in the MV and RF analysis. Conclusion: The FO phenotypes consist of patients admitted after surgery or with sepsis/septic shock with high lactate and low bicarbonate.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/2/336fluid resuscitationfluid overloadintensive carerisk factors
spellingShingle Anna S. Messmer
Michel Moser
Patrick Zuercher
Joerg C. Schefold
Martin Müller
Carmen A. Pfortmueller
Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
Journal of Clinical Medicine
fluid resuscitation
fluid overload
intensive care
risk factors
title Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
title_full Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
title_fullStr Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
title_full_unstemmed Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
title_short Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
title_sort fluid overload phenotypes in critical illness a machine learning approach
topic fluid resuscitation
fluid overload
intensive care
risk factors
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/2/336
work_keys_str_mv AT annasmessmer fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach
AT michelmoser fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach
AT patrickzuercher fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach
AT joergcschefold fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach
AT martinmuller fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach
AT carmenapfortmueller fluidoverloadphenotypesincriticalillnessamachinelearningapproach