L’expertise CHSCT en débat
Enhancing other contributions found in this “Controversies” issue, which is devoted to the expertise of health and safety committees, Sabine Fortino and Guillaume Tiffon ask Nicolas Spire, Louis-Marie Barnier and Fabien Gâche to debate topics in relation to which their analyses diverge, namely how i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
La Nouvelle Revue du Travail
2013-11-01
|
| Series: | La Nouvelle Revue du Travail |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/1345 |
| _version_ | 1828407314883805184 |
|---|---|
| author | Fabien Gâche Nicolas Spire Louis-Marie Barnier Sabine Fortino Guillaume Tiffon |
| author_facet | Fabien Gâche Nicolas Spire Louis-Marie Barnier Sabine Fortino Guillaume Tiffon |
| author_sort | Fabien Gâche |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Enhancing other contributions found in this “Controversies” issue, which is devoted to the expertise of health and safety committees, Sabine Fortino and Guillaume Tiffon ask Nicolas Spire, Louis-Marie Barnier and Fabien Gâche to debate topics in relation to which their analyses diverge, namely how independent experts are from their customers; to what extent they legitimise union discourse; how such expertise is used; its effects on the fight to improve working conditions; the contributions and limitations of alternative approaches like action research (in terms of elected officials’ difficulties in obtaining such expertise, appropriating it and translating it into union action). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:23:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ff8cfd8ca10d44279966bb117eecefdf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2263-8989 |
| language | fra |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T11:23:49Z |
| publishDate | 2013-11-01 |
| publisher | La Nouvelle Revue du Travail |
| record_format | Article |
| series | La Nouvelle Revue du Travail |
| spelling | doaj.art-ff8cfd8ca10d44279966bb117eecefdf2022-12-22T01:50:50ZfraLa Nouvelle Revue du TravailLa Nouvelle Revue du Travail2263-89892013-11-01310.4000/nrt.1345L’expertise CHSCT en débatFabien GâcheNicolas SpireLouis-Marie BarnierSabine FortinoGuillaume TiffonEnhancing other contributions found in this “Controversies” issue, which is devoted to the expertise of health and safety committees, Sabine Fortino and Guillaume Tiffon ask Nicolas Spire, Louis-Marie Barnier and Fabien Gâche to debate topics in relation to which their analyses diverge, namely how independent experts are from their customers; to what extent they legitimise union discourse; how such expertise is used; its effects on the fight to improve working conditions; the contributions and limitations of alternative approaches like action research (in terms of elected officials’ difficulties in obtaining such expertise, appropriating it and translating it into union action).http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/1345expertisesyndicalismeCHSCTconditions de travailsanté au travailrisques professionnels |
| spellingShingle | Fabien Gâche Nicolas Spire Louis-Marie Barnier Sabine Fortino Guillaume Tiffon L’expertise CHSCT en débat La Nouvelle Revue du Travail expertise syndicalisme CHSCT conditions de travail santé au travail risques professionnels |
| title | L’expertise CHSCT en débat |
| title_full | L’expertise CHSCT en débat |
| title_fullStr | L’expertise CHSCT en débat |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’expertise CHSCT en débat |
| title_short | L’expertise CHSCT en débat |
| title_sort | l expertise chsct en debat |
| topic | expertise syndicalisme CHSCT conditions de travail santé au travail risques professionnels |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/1345 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fabiengache lexpertisechsctendebat AT nicolasspire lexpertisechsctendebat AT louismariebarnier lexpertisechsctendebat AT sabinefortino lexpertisechsctendebat AT guillaumetiffon lexpertisechsctendebat |