Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
Abstract Background The red tape and delays around research ethics and governance approvals frequently frustrate researchers yet, as the lesser of two evils, are largely accepted as unavoidable. Here we quantify aspects of the research ethics and governance approvals for one interview- and questionn...
Main Authors: | Mila Petrova, Stephen Barclay |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5 |
Similar Items
-
Response to Correspondence from Kolstoe and colleagues concerning our paper entitled, Research approvals iceberg: How a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
by: Mila Petrova, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
OUTCOME OF CHILDREN WITH RETINOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY
by: Tariq Muhammad Saeed, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Attitudes towards evaluation of psychiatric disability claims: a survey of Swiss stakeholders
by: Stefan Schandelmaier, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01) -
Spraino: A novel low-friction device for prevention of lateral ankle sprain injuries in indoor sports
by: Filip Gertz Lysdal, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Identification of aspects of functioning, disability and health relevant to patients experiencing vertigo: a qualitative study using the international classification of functioning, disability and health
by: Mueller Martin, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)