The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets

Choreographer George Balanchine was known for rejecting the premise that his ballets were abstract. Yet, a closer look into his comments on abstraction reveals a greater degree of ambivalence toward the concept than previously noticed. His influential words found response in dance critical writing,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tamara Tomić-Vajagić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/9/4/119
_version_ 1797546933716254720
author Tamara Tomić-Vajagić
author_facet Tamara Tomić-Vajagić
author_sort Tamara Tomić-Vajagić
collection DOAJ
description Choreographer George Balanchine was known for rejecting the premise that his ballets were abstract. Yet, a closer look into his comments on abstraction reveals a greater degree of ambivalence toward the concept than previously noticed. His influential words found response in dance critical writing, where the term “abstract” continued to circulate, but was often applied in vague ways, such as “so-called abstraction.” This and other softened terminological variations formed an ambiguous collection of abstractive terms, like a vague word cloud around the dance concept. This article explores abstraction in Balanchine’s particular ballets, and makes a two-fold argument. On the one hand, by emphasizing the visual aspects of Balanchine’s compositions, we may uncover ways to untangle his dilemma about dance abstraction. Visual theories of “semantic abstraction” by Harold Osborne, and of “the gesture of abstraction” by Blake Stimson, may help us to understand the abstractive modes in several of Balanchine’s black-and-white ballets. On the other hand, whether discussed or not, Balanchine’s abstractive gestures have created powerful representational shifts in some cases. In particular, by examining the interracially cast duet from the ballet <i>Agon</i> (1957) as a visual case study, we may see how Balanchine’s rejections of the concept, amplified by critics’ vague terminological invocations of, or silence about, abstractive choreographic gestures, occluded the work’s participation in the discourse of abstraction. Simultaneously, unnoticed yet potent choreographic gestures of semantic abstraction may have promoted whiteness as a normative structure, one that relies on a hegemonic “bodily integrity” (as discussed by Saidiya Hartman). Such an analysis leads to a recognition that Balanchine’s abstraction could have been a subversive form of dissent similar to Kobena Mercer’s concept of “discrepant abstraction.” However, I posit that, as a result of the Balanchine dilemma and its influence, the interlinked gestures of an abstract nature that have not been recognized as such promoted the self-regulative structure identified by Bojana Cvejić as “white harmony.” Ultimately, a more specific and clear application of the term “abstract” in ballet is needed, as it can help to dismantle or disrupt the system of white supremacy operative in dominant ballet structures.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:36:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ff93b86989614cb6babd50a29da24c08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0752
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:36:31Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Arts
spelling doaj.art-ff93b86989614cb6babd50a29da24c082023-11-20T22:09:12ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522020-11-019411910.3390/arts9040119The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White BalletsTamara Tomić-Vajagić0Department of Dance, University of Roehampton, London SW15 5PU, UKChoreographer George Balanchine was known for rejecting the premise that his ballets were abstract. Yet, a closer look into his comments on abstraction reveals a greater degree of ambivalence toward the concept than previously noticed. His influential words found response in dance critical writing, where the term “abstract” continued to circulate, but was often applied in vague ways, such as “so-called abstraction.” This and other softened terminological variations formed an ambiguous collection of abstractive terms, like a vague word cloud around the dance concept. This article explores abstraction in Balanchine’s particular ballets, and makes a two-fold argument. On the one hand, by emphasizing the visual aspects of Balanchine’s compositions, we may uncover ways to untangle his dilemma about dance abstraction. Visual theories of “semantic abstraction” by Harold Osborne, and of “the gesture of abstraction” by Blake Stimson, may help us to understand the abstractive modes in several of Balanchine’s black-and-white ballets. On the other hand, whether discussed or not, Balanchine’s abstractive gestures have created powerful representational shifts in some cases. In particular, by examining the interracially cast duet from the ballet <i>Agon</i> (1957) as a visual case study, we may see how Balanchine’s rejections of the concept, amplified by critics’ vague terminological invocations of, or silence about, abstractive choreographic gestures, occluded the work’s participation in the discourse of abstraction. Simultaneously, unnoticed yet potent choreographic gestures of semantic abstraction may have promoted whiteness as a normative structure, one that relies on a hegemonic “bodily integrity” (as discussed by Saidiya Hartman). Such an analysis leads to a recognition that Balanchine’s abstraction could have been a subversive form of dissent similar to Kobena Mercer’s concept of “discrepant abstraction.” However, I posit that, as a result of the Balanchine dilemma and its influence, the interlinked gestures of an abstract nature that have not been recognized as such promoted the self-regulative structure identified by Bojana Cvejić as “white harmony.” Ultimately, a more specific and clear application of the term “abstract” in ballet is needed, as it can help to dismantle or disrupt the system of white supremacy operative in dominant ballet structures.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/9/4/119George Balanchineblack-and-white ballets<i>Agon</i>Arthur Mitchellvisualitysemantic abstraction
spellingShingle Tamara Tomić-Vajagić
The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
Arts
George Balanchine
black-and-white ballets
<i>Agon</i>
Arthur Mitchell
visuality
semantic abstraction
title The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
title_full The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
title_fullStr The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
title_full_unstemmed The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
title_short The Balanchine Dilemma: “So-Called Abstraction” and the Rhetoric of Circumvention in Black-and-White Ballets
title_sort balanchine dilemma so called abstraction and the rhetoric of circumvention in black and white ballets
topic George Balanchine
black-and-white ballets
<i>Agon</i>
Arthur Mitchell
visuality
semantic abstraction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/9/4/119
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaratomicvajagic thebalanchinedilemmasocalledabstractionandtherhetoricofcircumventioninblackandwhiteballets
AT tamaratomicvajagic balanchinedilemmasocalledabstractionandtherhetoricofcircumventioninblackandwhiteballets