Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review

Background: Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants has been linked to congenital heart defects (CHD), but findings of existing systematic reviews have been mixed. Objective: To assess the epidemiological evidence on associations between prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and CHD subtyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Michel, Aishwarya Atmakuri, Ondine S. von Ehrenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Environment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023003495
_version_ 1797742642891587584
author Sophie Michel
Aishwarya Atmakuri
Ondine S. von Ehrenstein
author_facet Sophie Michel
Aishwarya Atmakuri
Ondine S. von Ehrenstein
author_sort Sophie Michel
collection DOAJ
description Background: Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants has been linked to congenital heart defects (CHD), but findings of existing systematic reviews have been mixed. Objective: To assess the epidemiological evidence on associations between prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and CHD subtypes, based on a systematic overview of reviews (“umbrella review”). Methods: We conducted a systematic search for reviews assessing associations between prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and CHD. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the systematic review findings was graded using the Navigation Guide methodology. Results: We identified eleven systematic reviews, including eight with meta-analyses, assessing in total 35 primary studies of prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and various CHD subtypes. The certainty of the findings of four meta-analyses indicating an increased risk for coarctation of the aorta associated with nitrogen dioxide exposure was rated as moderate. The certainty of findings indicating positive, inverse, or null associations for other pollutant-subtype combinations was rated as very low to low, based on low precision and high statistical heterogeneity of summary odds ratios (SOR), substantial inconsistencies between review findings, and methodological limitations of the systematic reviews. Discussion: The inconsistent findings and high statistical heterogeneity of many SOR of the included systematic reviews may partly be traced to differences in methodological approaches, and the risk of bias across included reviews (e.g., inclusion criteria, systematic search strategies, synthesis methods) and primary studies (e.g., exposure assessment, diagnostic criteria). Adherence to appropriate systematic review guidelines for environmental health research, as well as rigorous evaluation of risk of bias in primary studies, are essential for future risk assessments and policy-making. Still, our findings suggest that prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants may increase risks for at least some CHD subtypes.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:43:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ffbadad25dd84e8082941d0db77c3846
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0160-4120
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:43:33Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Environment International
spelling doaj.art-ffbadad25dd84e8082941d0db77c38462023-08-16T04:26:20ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202023-08-01178108076Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella reviewSophie Michel0Aishwarya Atmakuri1Ondine S. von Ehrenstein2Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Corresponding author at: 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USADepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USABackground: Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants has been linked to congenital heart defects (CHD), but findings of existing systematic reviews have been mixed. Objective: To assess the epidemiological evidence on associations between prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and CHD subtypes, based on a systematic overview of reviews (“umbrella review”). Methods: We conducted a systematic search for reviews assessing associations between prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and CHD. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. The certainty of the systematic review findings was graded using the Navigation Guide methodology. Results: We identified eleven systematic reviews, including eight with meta-analyses, assessing in total 35 primary studies of prenatal exposure to criteria air pollutants and various CHD subtypes. The certainty of the findings of four meta-analyses indicating an increased risk for coarctation of the aorta associated with nitrogen dioxide exposure was rated as moderate. The certainty of findings indicating positive, inverse, or null associations for other pollutant-subtype combinations was rated as very low to low, based on low precision and high statistical heterogeneity of summary odds ratios (SOR), substantial inconsistencies between review findings, and methodological limitations of the systematic reviews. Discussion: The inconsistent findings and high statistical heterogeneity of many SOR of the included systematic reviews may partly be traced to differences in methodological approaches, and the risk of bias across included reviews (e.g., inclusion criteria, systematic search strategies, synthesis methods) and primary studies (e.g., exposure assessment, diagnostic criteria). Adherence to appropriate systematic review guidelines for environmental health research, as well as rigorous evaluation of risk of bias in primary studies, are essential for future risk assessments and policy-making. Still, our findings suggest that prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants may increase risks for at least some CHD subtypes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023003495Ambient air pollutionPrenatal exposureEnvironmental risk factorsCongenital heart defectsSystematic reviewsUmbrella review
spellingShingle Sophie Michel
Aishwarya Atmakuri
Ondine S. von Ehrenstein
Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
Environment International
Ambient air pollution
Prenatal exposure
Environmental risk factors
Congenital heart defects
Systematic reviews
Umbrella review
title Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
title_full Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
title_fullStr Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
title_short Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects: An umbrella review
title_sort prenatal exposure to ambient air pollutants and congenital heart defects an umbrella review
topic Ambient air pollution
Prenatal exposure
Environmental risk factors
Congenital heart defects
Systematic reviews
Umbrella review
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023003495
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiemichel prenatalexposuretoambientairpollutantsandcongenitalheartdefectsanumbrellareview
AT aishwaryaatmakuri prenatalexposuretoambientairpollutantsandcongenitalheartdefectsanumbrellareview
AT ondinesvonehrenstein prenatalexposuretoambientairpollutantsandcongenitalheartdefectsanumbrellareview