Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?

People who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are frequently excluded from research, yet their voices can significantly enhance the applicability, acceptability, and translation of qualitative research findings. Accessible and adapted research methods welcome and empower participan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan Walsh, Izzi Harman, Penny Manning, Brenton Ponza, Shirley Wong, Brodie Shaw, Darryl Sellwood, Kate Anderson, Dinah Reddihough, Margaret Wallen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-02-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234190
_version_ 1797300328030273536
author Megan Walsh
Izzi Harman
Penny Manning
Brenton Ponza
Shirley Wong
Brodie Shaw
Darryl Sellwood
Kate Anderson
Dinah Reddihough
Margaret Wallen
author_facet Megan Walsh
Izzi Harman
Penny Manning
Brenton Ponza
Shirley Wong
Brodie Shaw
Darryl Sellwood
Kate Anderson
Dinah Reddihough
Margaret Wallen
author_sort Megan Walsh
collection DOAJ
description People who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are frequently excluded from research, yet their voices can significantly enhance the applicability, acceptability, and translation of qualitative research findings. Accessible and adapted research methods welcome and empower participants who use AAC, and enable meaningful involvement. In this article, we describe the collaborative development of a framework to conceptualise inclusive research and aspects of an accompanying inclusive research toolkit. The framework identifies balancing power as a critical factor, primarily achieved by ensuring that research methods and materials are accessible to people who use AAC. We propose that this is achieved through three interacting elements: collaboration with AAC users, skills and knowledge to achieve accessibility, and ensuring adequate time is available to achieve involvement. We identify five areas where applying these elements has impact for AAC users: recruiting AAC users, working with communication supporters, adapting research methods, securing ethics approval, and consent. In presenting the framework, we demonstrate how qualitative researchers can foster a research environment that values and actively includes AAC users, ultimately advancing the field towards more comprehensive and inclusive research practices. While our work is situated in the cerebral palsy and AAC communities, our proposed framework and toolkit can be applied by researchers seeking perspectives from individuals with communication disabilities more broadly. We have created a corresponding plain language video of this article as an additional means of optimising accessibility of the content. See supplemental material .
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:04:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ffbdcfc50a014178ade2973f891fa73d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1609-4069
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:04:42Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
spelling doaj.art-ffbdcfc50a014178ade2973f891fa73d2024-02-22T06:03:18ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692024-02-012310.1177/16094069241234190Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?Megan WalshIzzi HarmanPenny ManningBrenton PonzaShirley WongBrodie ShawDarryl SellwoodKate AndersonDinah ReddihoughMargaret WallenPeople who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are frequently excluded from research, yet their voices can significantly enhance the applicability, acceptability, and translation of qualitative research findings. Accessible and adapted research methods welcome and empower participants who use AAC, and enable meaningful involvement. In this article, we describe the collaborative development of a framework to conceptualise inclusive research and aspects of an accompanying inclusive research toolkit. The framework identifies balancing power as a critical factor, primarily achieved by ensuring that research methods and materials are accessible to people who use AAC. We propose that this is achieved through three interacting elements: collaboration with AAC users, skills and knowledge to achieve accessibility, and ensuring adequate time is available to achieve involvement. We identify five areas where applying these elements has impact for AAC users: recruiting AAC users, working with communication supporters, adapting research methods, securing ethics approval, and consent. In presenting the framework, we demonstrate how qualitative researchers can foster a research environment that values and actively includes AAC users, ultimately advancing the field towards more comprehensive and inclusive research practices. While our work is situated in the cerebral palsy and AAC communities, our proposed framework and toolkit can be applied by researchers seeking perspectives from individuals with communication disabilities more broadly. We have created a corresponding plain language video of this article as an additional means of optimising accessibility of the content. See supplemental material .https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234190
spellingShingle Megan Walsh
Izzi Harman
Penny Manning
Brenton Ponza
Shirley Wong
Brodie Shaw
Darryl Sellwood
Kate Anderson
Dinah Reddihough
Margaret Wallen
Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
title Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
title_full Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
title_fullStr Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
title_full_unstemmed Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
title_short Including People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Qualitative Research: Can You Hear Us?
title_sort including people who use augmentative and alternative communication in qualitative research can you hear us
url https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234190
work_keys_str_mv AT meganwalsh includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT izziharman includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT pennymanning includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT brentonponza includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT shirleywong includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT brodieshaw includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT darrylsellwood includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT kateanderson includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT dinahreddihough includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus
AT margaretwallen includingpeoplewhouseaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationinqualitativeresearchcanyouhearus