Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.

This fMRI study examines how students extend their mathematical competence. Students solved a set of algebra-like problems. These problems included Regular Problems that have a known solution technique and Exception Problems that but did not have a known technique. Two distinct networks of activity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Wintermute, Shawn Betts, Jennifer L Ferris, Jon M Fincham, John R Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3519473?pdf=render
_version_ 1818277474852667392
author Samuel Wintermute
Shawn Betts
Jennifer L Ferris
Jon M Fincham
John R Anderson
author_facet Samuel Wintermute
Shawn Betts
Jennifer L Ferris
Jon M Fincham
John R Anderson
author_sort Samuel Wintermute
collection DOAJ
description This fMRI study examines how students extend their mathematical competence. Students solved a set of algebra-like problems. These problems included Regular Problems that have a known solution technique and Exception Problems that but did not have a known technique. Two distinct networks of activity were uncovered. There was a Cognitive Network that was mainly active during the solution of problems and showed little difference between Regular Problems and Exception Problems. There was also a Metacognitive Network that was more engaged during a reflection period after the solution and was much more engaged for Exception Problems than Regular Problems. The Cognitive Network overlaps with prefrontal and parietal regions identified in the ACT-R theory of algebra problem solving and regions identified in the triple-code theory as involved in basic mathematical cognition. The Metacognitive Network included angular gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and anterior prefrontal regions. This network is mainly engaged by the need to modify the solution procedure and not by the difficulty of the problem. Only the Metacognitive Network decreased with practice on the Exception Problems. Activity in the Cognitive Network during the solution of an Exception Problem predicted both success on that problem and future mastery. Activity in the angular gyrus and middle temporal gyrus during feedback on errors predicted future mastery.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T23:02:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ffc5d6fa7ef246e9b4a52b183f870990
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T23:02:07Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ffc5d6fa7ef246e9b4a52b183f8709902022-12-22T00:08:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5015410.1371/journal.pone.0050154Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.Samuel WintermuteShawn BettsJennifer L FerrisJon M FinchamJohn R AndersonThis fMRI study examines how students extend their mathematical competence. Students solved a set of algebra-like problems. These problems included Regular Problems that have a known solution technique and Exception Problems that but did not have a known technique. Two distinct networks of activity were uncovered. There was a Cognitive Network that was mainly active during the solution of problems and showed little difference between Regular Problems and Exception Problems. There was also a Metacognitive Network that was more engaged during a reflection period after the solution and was much more engaged for Exception Problems than Regular Problems. The Cognitive Network overlaps with prefrontal and parietal regions identified in the ACT-R theory of algebra problem solving and regions identified in the triple-code theory as involved in basic mathematical cognition. The Metacognitive Network included angular gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and anterior prefrontal regions. This network is mainly engaged by the need to modify the solution procedure and not by the difficulty of the problem. Only the Metacognitive Network decreased with practice on the Exception Problems. Activity in the Cognitive Network during the solution of an Exception Problem predicted both success on that problem and future mastery. Activity in the angular gyrus and middle temporal gyrus during feedback on errors predicted future mastery.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3519473?pdf=render
spellingShingle Samuel Wintermute
Shawn Betts
Jennifer L Ferris
Jon M Fincham
John R Anderson
Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
PLoS ONE
title Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
title_full Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
title_fullStr Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
title_full_unstemmed Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
title_short Brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence.
title_sort brain networks supporting execution of mathematical skills versus acquisition of new mathematical competence
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3519473?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelwintermute brainnetworkssupportingexecutionofmathematicalskillsversusacquisitionofnewmathematicalcompetence
AT shawnbetts brainnetworkssupportingexecutionofmathematicalskillsversusacquisitionofnewmathematicalcompetence
AT jenniferlferris brainnetworkssupportingexecutionofmathematicalskillsversusacquisitionofnewmathematicalcompetence
AT jonmfincham brainnetworkssupportingexecutionofmathematicalskillsversusacquisitionofnewmathematicalcompetence
AT johnranderson brainnetworkssupportingexecutionofmathematicalskillsversusacquisitionofnewmathematicalcompetence