What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review
Abstract Background UNESCO biosphere reserves (BRs) have historically aimed to play a crucial role in contributing to sustainable development by bringing about win–win outcomes for both biodiversity and socio-economic development. However, recent studies show the need for a more thorough understandi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Evidence |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00322-1 |
| _version_ | 1797388586899734528 |
|---|---|
| author | Nguyen Phuong Thao Jacqualyn Eales Duong Minh Lam Vu Thuc Hien Ruth Garside |
| author_facet | Nguyen Phuong Thao Jacqualyn Eales Duong Minh Lam Vu Thuc Hien Ruth Garside |
| author_sort | Nguyen Phuong Thao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background UNESCO biosphere reserves (BRs) have historically aimed to play a crucial role in contributing to sustainable development by bringing about win–win outcomes for both biodiversity and socio-economic development. However, recent studies show the need for a more thorough understanding of how conservation activities impact on and are affected by socio-economic development. Method We built this systematic review on a systematic map by Eales et al. [14] adding studies from further academic database and grey literature searches specifically designed for this systematic review. Because studies were not sufficiently homogeneous in their outcomes to warrant a valid meta-analysis, we used narrative synthesis to explore the studies’ findings. Results We assessed 10,053 titles and abstracts from database searches and Google Scholar. 343 articles were screened at full text and 16 studies were included in our review. Of the 16 studies, 3 were assessed as having overall high validity, 8 having moderate validity and 3 having low validity of evidence. 2 studies did not provide sufficient information for validity categorisation (unclear validity). Effects on economic living standards, reported in 11 studies, were in both desired and undesired directions, though most high validity studies reported no significant difference, and most others did not test for significance. Most studies reported that BR interventions were associated with positive impacts on material living standards. In general, studies reported good relations between local people and local enforcement/government following interventions in BRs. BR interventions may both reduce or cause social conflict, though the higher validity studies showed results in the desired direction. In one study, there was a positive impact on population family planning outcomes, when a reproductive health intervention was implemented with conservation efforts. There was no clear impact in either direction regarding education. Across two studies the overall message is positive for the subjective wellbeing of local people. Conclusions With 727 BRs worldwide, the BR model has been accepted and developed as an approach to facilitate the implementation of the UN's SDGs. However, our work shows that interventions implemented in UNESCO BRs can bring about impacts in quite diverse ways: positive, negative, unchanged, and may often present both positive and negative impacts in the same situation. This reconfirms that the expected win–win outcomes of UNESCO BR model in terms of biodiversity and socio-economic development should be more carefully considered. We suggest some main points for consideration, particularly when developing management mechanisms for UNESCO biosphere reserves and/or managing activities in biosphere reserves. We also highlight the need for further research to explore the socio-economic impacts of the UNESCO biosphere reserves in Southeast Asia, especially on the domains of freedom of choice and action, security and safety, and culture and spirituality. Moreover, it is vital to have research projects that measure long-term impacts of biosphere reserves, which have been lacking in previous work. Finally, the potential impact of external factors should be considered in programme and monitoring design. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:41:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ffe41aeeb98342719fff099c0077caad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2047-2382 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:41:56Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Evidence |
| spelling | doaj.art-ffe41aeeb98342719fff099c0077caad2023-12-17T12:07:13ZengBMCEnvironmental Evidence2047-23822023-12-0112112910.1186/s13750-023-00322-1What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic reviewNguyen Phuong Thao0Jacqualyn Eales1Duong Minh Lam2Vu Thuc Hien3Ruth Garside4Hanoi National University of EducationEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, Peter Lanyon Building, University of Exeter Penryn CampusHanoi National University of EducationHanoi National University of EducationEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, Peter Lanyon Building, University of Exeter Penryn CampusAbstract Background UNESCO biosphere reserves (BRs) have historically aimed to play a crucial role in contributing to sustainable development by bringing about win–win outcomes for both biodiversity and socio-economic development. However, recent studies show the need for a more thorough understanding of how conservation activities impact on and are affected by socio-economic development. Method We built this systematic review on a systematic map by Eales et al. [14] adding studies from further academic database and grey literature searches specifically designed for this systematic review. Because studies were not sufficiently homogeneous in their outcomes to warrant a valid meta-analysis, we used narrative synthesis to explore the studies’ findings. Results We assessed 10,053 titles and abstracts from database searches and Google Scholar. 343 articles were screened at full text and 16 studies were included in our review. Of the 16 studies, 3 were assessed as having overall high validity, 8 having moderate validity and 3 having low validity of evidence. 2 studies did not provide sufficient information for validity categorisation (unclear validity). Effects on economic living standards, reported in 11 studies, were in both desired and undesired directions, though most high validity studies reported no significant difference, and most others did not test for significance. Most studies reported that BR interventions were associated with positive impacts on material living standards. In general, studies reported good relations between local people and local enforcement/government following interventions in BRs. BR interventions may both reduce or cause social conflict, though the higher validity studies showed results in the desired direction. In one study, there was a positive impact on population family planning outcomes, when a reproductive health intervention was implemented with conservation efforts. There was no clear impact in either direction regarding education. Across two studies the overall message is positive for the subjective wellbeing of local people. Conclusions With 727 BRs worldwide, the BR model has been accepted and developed as an approach to facilitate the implementation of the UN's SDGs. However, our work shows that interventions implemented in UNESCO BRs can bring about impacts in quite diverse ways: positive, negative, unchanged, and may often present both positive and negative impacts in the same situation. This reconfirms that the expected win–win outcomes of UNESCO BR model in terms of biodiversity and socio-economic development should be more carefully considered. We suggest some main points for consideration, particularly when developing management mechanisms for UNESCO biosphere reserves and/or managing activities in biosphere reserves. We also highlight the need for further research to explore the socio-economic impacts of the UNESCO biosphere reserves in Southeast Asia, especially on the domains of freedom of choice and action, security and safety, and culture and spirituality. Moreover, it is vital to have research projects that measure long-term impacts of biosphere reserves, which have been lacking in previous work. Finally, the potential impact of external factors should be considered in programme and monitoring design.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00322-1ConservationLivelihoodSustainable developmentBiodiversityEconomic development |
| spellingShingle | Nguyen Phuong Thao Jacqualyn Eales Duong Minh Lam Vu Thuc Hien Ruth Garside What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review Environmental Evidence Conservation Livelihood Sustainable development Biodiversity Economic development |
| title | What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review |
| title_full | What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review |
| title_short | What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review |
| title_sort | what are the impacts of activities undertaken in unesco biosphere reserves on socio economic wellbeing in southeast asia a systematic review |
| topic | Conservation Livelihood Sustainable development Biodiversity Economic development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00322-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenphuongthao whataretheimpactsofactivitiesundertakeninunescobiospherereservesonsocioeconomicwellbeinginsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT jacqualyneales whataretheimpactsofactivitiesundertakeninunescobiospherereservesonsocioeconomicwellbeinginsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT duongminhlam whataretheimpactsofactivitiesundertakeninunescobiospherereservesonsocioeconomicwellbeinginsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT vuthuchien whataretheimpactsofactivitiesundertakeninunescobiospherereservesonsocioeconomicwellbeinginsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT ruthgarside whataretheimpactsofactivitiesundertakeninunescobiospherereservesonsocioeconomicwellbeinginsoutheastasiaasystematicreview |