Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening

Introduction Rural versus urban disparities have been observed in diabetic eye screening, but whether the level of disadvantage in rural versus urban areas is related to these disparities is unclear. Our goal was to determine the role of level of disadvantage in explaining the effect of health syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yao Liu, Roomasa Channa, Ying Cao, Loren J Lock, Meghan B Brennan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-01
Series:BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
Online Access:https://drc.bmj.com/content/10/6/e003174.full
_version_ 1797980714604429312
author Yao Liu
Roomasa Channa
Ying Cao
Loren J Lock
Meghan B Brennan
author_facet Yao Liu
Roomasa Channa
Ying Cao
Loren J Lock
Meghan B Brennan
author_sort Yao Liu
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Rural versus urban disparities have been observed in diabetic eye screening, but whether the level of disadvantage in rural versus urban areas is related to these disparities is unclear. Our goal was to determine the role of level of disadvantage in explaining the effect of health systems on rural and urban disparities in diabetic eye screening.Research design and methods This is a retrospective cohort study using an all-payer, state-wide claims database covering over 75% of Wisconsin residents. We included adults with diabetes (18–75 years old) who had claims billed throughout the baseline (2012–2013) and measurement (2013–2014) years. We performed multivariable regressions to assess factors associated with receipt of diabetic eye screening. The primary exposure was the primary care clinic’s combined level of rurality and disadvantage. We adjusted for the health system as well as patient-level variables related to demographics and comorbidities. Health system was defined as an associated group of physicians and/or clinics.Results A total of 118 707 adults with diabetes from 698 primary care clinics in 143 health systems met the inclusion criteria. Patients from urban underserved clinics were less likely to receive screening than those from rural underserved clinics before adjusting for health system in the model. After adjusting for health system fixed effects, however, the directionality of the relationship between clinic rurality and screening reversed: patients from urban underserved clinics were more likely to receive screening than those from rural underserved clinics. Similar findings were observed for both Medicare and non-Medicare subgroups.Conclusions The effect of health system on receipt of diabetic eye screening in rural versus urban areas is most pronounced in underserved areas. Health systems, particularly those providing care to urban underserved populations, have an opportunity to increase screening rates by leveraging health system-level interventions to support patients in overcoming barriers from social determinants of health.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:59:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ffe91d9db7b042038a7ec0cf402e6adf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-4897
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:59:17Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
spelling doaj.art-ffe91d9db7b042038a7ec0cf402e6adf2022-12-22T04:41:48ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care2052-48972022-12-0110610.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003174Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screeningYao Liu0Roomasa Channa1Ying Cao2Loren J Lock3Meghan B Brennan4Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USADepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USADepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Amy Medical University), Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USAIntroduction Rural versus urban disparities have been observed in diabetic eye screening, but whether the level of disadvantage in rural versus urban areas is related to these disparities is unclear. Our goal was to determine the role of level of disadvantage in explaining the effect of health systems on rural and urban disparities in diabetic eye screening.Research design and methods This is a retrospective cohort study using an all-payer, state-wide claims database covering over 75% of Wisconsin residents. We included adults with diabetes (18–75 years old) who had claims billed throughout the baseline (2012–2013) and measurement (2013–2014) years. We performed multivariable regressions to assess factors associated with receipt of diabetic eye screening. The primary exposure was the primary care clinic’s combined level of rurality and disadvantage. We adjusted for the health system as well as patient-level variables related to demographics and comorbidities. Health system was defined as an associated group of physicians and/or clinics.Results A total of 118 707 adults with diabetes from 698 primary care clinics in 143 health systems met the inclusion criteria. Patients from urban underserved clinics were less likely to receive screening than those from rural underserved clinics before adjusting for health system in the model. After adjusting for health system fixed effects, however, the directionality of the relationship between clinic rurality and screening reversed: patients from urban underserved clinics were more likely to receive screening than those from rural underserved clinics. Similar findings were observed for both Medicare and non-Medicare subgroups.Conclusions The effect of health system on receipt of diabetic eye screening in rural versus urban areas is most pronounced in underserved areas. Health systems, particularly those providing care to urban underserved populations, have an opportunity to increase screening rates by leveraging health system-level interventions to support patients in overcoming barriers from social determinants of health.https://drc.bmj.com/content/10/6/e003174.full
spellingShingle Yao Liu
Roomasa Channa
Ying Cao
Loren J Lock
Meghan B Brennan
Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
title Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
title_full Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
title_fullStr Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
title_full_unstemmed Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
title_short Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
title_sort effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening
url https://drc.bmj.com/content/10/6/e003174.full
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoliu effectofhealthsystemontheassociationofruralityandlevelofdisadvantagewithreceiptofdiabeticeyescreening
AT roomasachanna effectofhealthsystemontheassociationofruralityandlevelofdisadvantagewithreceiptofdiabeticeyescreening
AT yingcao effectofhealthsystemontheassociationofruralityandlevelofdisadvantagewithreceiptofdiabeticeyescreening
AT lorenjlock effectofhealthsystemontheassociationofruralityandlevelofdisadvantagewithreceiptofdiabeticeyescreening
AT meghanbbrennan effectofhealthsystemontheassociationofruralityandlevelofdisadvantagewithreceiptofdiabeticeyescreening