Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors
In the past decade, there has been significant progress in development of the colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photodetectors. The QCD’s potential advantages include: cheap and easy fabrications, size-tuneable across wide infrared spectral region, and direct coating on silicon electronics for imaging, wh...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Polish Academy of Sciences
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.pan.pl/Content/117256/PDF/21_845-855_01622_Bpast.No.68-4_27.08.20.pdf |
_version_ | 1811342628021600256 |
---|---|
author | A. Rogalski Małgorzata Kopytko Piotr Martyniuk W. Hu |
author_facet | A. Rogalski Małgorzata Kopytko Piotr Martyniuk W. Hu |
author_sort | A. Rogalski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the past decade, there has been significant progress in development of the colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photodetectors. The QCD’s potential advantages include: cheap and easy fabrications, size-tuneable across wide infrared spectral region, and direct coating on silicon electronics for imaging, which potentially reduces array cost and offers new modifications like flexible infrared detectors. The performance of CQD high operating temperature (HOT) photodetectors is lower in comparison with detectors traditionally available on the global market (InGaAs, HgCdTe and type-II superlattices). In several papers their performance is compared with the semiempirical rule, “Rule 07” (specified in 2007) for P-on-n HgCdTe photodiodes. However, at present stage of technology, the fully-depleted background limited HgCdTe photodiodes can achieve the level of room-temperature dark current considerably lower than predicted by Rule 07. In this paper, the performance of HOT CQD photodetectors is compared with that predicted for depleted P-i-N HgCdTe photodiodes. Theoretical estimations are collated with experimental data for both HgCdTe photodiodes and CQD detectors. The presented estimates provide further encouragement for achieving low-cost and high performance MWIR and LWIR HgCdTe focal plane arrays operating in HOT conditions. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T19:14:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ffee6a8723e64ff79f414b1f01c2369c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2300-1917 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T19:14:12Z |
publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
publisher | Polish Academy of Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-ffee6a8723e64ff79f414b1f01c2369c2022-12-22T02:33:43ZengPolish Academy of SciencesBulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences2300-19172020-08-0168No. 4 (i.a. Special Section on Advances in Electrical Power Engineering)845855https://doi.org/10.24425/bpasts.2020.134174Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectorsA. RogalskiMałgorzata Kopytkohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-3310Piotr Martyniukhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1963-3521W. HuIn the past decade, there has been significant progress in development of the colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photodetectors. The QCD’s potential advantages include: cheap and easy fabrications, size-tuneable across wide infrared spectral region, and direct coating on silicon electronics for imaging, which potentially reduces array cost and offers new modifications like flexible infrared detectors. The performance of CQD high operating temperature (HOT) photodetectors is lower in comparison with detectors traditionally available on the global market (InGaAs, HgCdTe and type-II superlattices). In several papers their performance is compared with the semiempirical rule, “Rule 07” (specified in 2007) for P-on-n HgCdTe photodiodes. However, at present stage of technology, the fully-depleted background limited HgCdTe photodiodes can achieve the level of room-temperature dark current considerably lower than predicted by Rule 07. In this paper, the performance of HOT CQD photodetectors is compared with that predicted for depleted P-i-N HgCdTe photodiodes. Theoretical estimations are collated with experimental data for both HgCdTe photodiodes and CQD detectors. The presented estimates provide further encouragement for achieving low-cost and high performance MWIR and LWIR HgCdTe focal plane arrays operating in HOT conditions.https://journals.pan.pl/Content/117256/PDF/21_845-855_01622_Bpast.No.68-4_27.08.20.pdfcolloidal quantum dot infrared photodetectorshot infrared detectorshgcdte photodiodesp-i-n depleted photodiodesblip performance |
spellingShingle | A. Rogalski Małgorzata Kopytko Piotr Martyniuk W. Hu Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences colloidal quantum dot infrared photodetectors hot infrared detectors hgcdte photodiodes p-i-n depleted photodiodes blip performance |
title | Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
title_full | Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
title_fullStr | Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
title_short | Comparison of performance limits of the HOT HgCdTe photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
title_sort | comparison of performance limits of the hot hgcdte photodiodes with colloidal quantum dot infrared detectors |
topic | colloidal quantum dot infrared photodetectors hot infrared detectors hgcdte photodiodes p-i-n depleted photodiodes blip performance |
url | https://journals.pan.pl/Content/117256/PDF/21_845-855_01622_Bpast.No.68-4_27.08.20.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arogalski comparisonofperformancelimitsofthehothgcdtephotodiodeswithcolloidalquantumdotinfrareddetectors AT małgorzatakopytko comparisonofperformancelimitsofthehothgcdtephotodiodeswithcolloidalquantumdotinfrareddetectors AT piotrmartyniuk comparisonofperformancelimitsofthehothgcdtephotodiodeswithcolloidalquantumdotinfrareddetectors AT whu comparisonofperformancelimitsofthehothgcdtephotodiodeswithcolloidalquantumdotinfrareddetectors |