Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process.

<h4>Background</h4>Supervisors play a pivotal role in the sick leave process. Although responsibility for sick leave and return to work follow-up is increasingly placed on the workplace in Norway, few studies have explored supervisors' experiences. This study aims to explore supervi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Elisabeth Klevanger, Lene Aasdahl, Marit By Rise
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284369
Description
Summary:<h4>Background</h4>Supervisors play a pivotal role in the sick leave process. Although responsibility for sick leave and return to work follow-up is increasingly placed on the workplace in Norway, few studies have explored supervisors' experiences. This study aims to explore supervisors´ experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return to work process.<h4>Methods</h4>This study consists of individual interviews with 11 supervisors from diverse workplaces that was analysed thematically.<h4>Results</h4>The supervisors emphasised the value of presence at the workplace, the need for them to obtain information and uphold dialogue, considering individual and environmental influences on return-to-work and allocating responsibility. Investing time and money was crucial to prevent or reduce the negative impact of sick leave.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The supervisors' perception of attending to sick leave and return-to-work largely reflect Norwegian legislation. However, they find obtaining information and managing responsibility challenging, suggesting that their responsibilities for return-to-work are perhaps disproportionate to their knowledge on attending this process. Individualised support and guidance on how to develop accommodations based on the employee´s workability should be made available. The reciprocal nature of follow-up described also reveals how the return-to-work process is enmeshed with (inter)personal considerations possibly resulting in unequal treatment.
ISSN:1932-6203