Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi

The decision about the relevant information in social care should be made in co-operation with the social care professionals. That is why the data model of Finnish social welfare was evaluated by the social care professionals between 2013 and 2015. The professionals came all over Finland. They evalu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erja Ailio, Niina Häkälä, Jarmo Kärki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association 2017-05-01
Series:Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/60989
_version_ 1818567766244851712
author Erja Ailio
Niina Häkälä
Jarmo Kärki
author_facet Erja Ailio
Niina Häkälä
Jarmo Kärki
author_sort Erja Ailio
collection DOAJ
description The decision about the relevant information in social care should be made in co-operation with the social care professionals. That is why the data model of Finnish social welfare was evaluated by the social care professionals between 2013 and 2015. The professionals came all over Finland. They evaluated the quality of the client document structures in the data model. They also evaluated the details in every client document structure, for example the necessity, the correct location and the correct data type of each data field. Altogether over 2 000 comments were given. The results in this article are based on the summary table which was made by the consultant. Most of the comments concerned those document structures which were extensive by their content and essential in client work, for example the assessments of service need and the client plans. Based on the feedback several client document structures were removed, the data fields for narrative documentation were increased, the data fields for structured documentation were decreased and several minor changes were made. Collecting and analysing feedback systematically is an efficient way to enhance and to confirm the quality of data structures. Challenging is that the operational environment, the client data system used, and the habit of documentation have a significant impact on professionals’ views about the relevant information and data structures. When collecting feedback, the presentation of the data structures should be as understandable as possible; this could be achieved for example by simulating client data system interfaces. This could have a positive effect on the quality of the feedback. In addition to data structures also the other properties of the information systems should be created in co-operation with the social care professionals.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T06:27:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fff32f6bf1c64976a0fef8e0076e31ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1798-0798
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T06:27:36Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association
record_format Article
series Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
spelling doaj.art-fff32f6bf1c64976a0fef8e0076e31ca2022-12-21T23:13:38ZengFinnish Social and Health Informatics AssociationFinnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare1798-07982017-05-0192-310.23996/fjhw.60989Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointiErja Ailio0Niina Häkälä1Jarmo Kärki2Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL), HelsinkiTerveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL), HelsinkiTerveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL), HelsinkiThe decision about the relevant information in social care should be made in co-operation with the social care professionals. That is why the data model of Finnish social welfare was evaluated by the social care professionals between 2013 and 2015. The professionals came all over Finland. They evaluated the quality of the client document structures in the data model. They also evaluated the details in every client document structure, for example the necessity, the correct location and the correct data type of each data field. Altogether over 2 000 comments were given. The results in this article are based on the summary table which was made by the consultant. Most of the comments concerned those document structures which were extensive by their content and essential in client work, for example the assessments of service need and the client plans. Based on the feedback several client document structures were removed, the data fields for narrative documentation were increased, the data fields for structured documentation were decreased and several minor changes were made. Collecting and analysing feedback systematically is an efficient way to enhance and to confirm the quality of data structures. Challenging is that the operational environment, the client data system used, and the habit of documentation have a significant impact on professionals’ views about the relevant information and data structures. When collecting feedback, the presentation of the data structures should be as understandable as possible; this could be achieved for example by simulating client data system interfaces. This could have a positive effect on the quality of the feedback. In addition to data structures also the other properties of the information systems should be created in co-operation with the social care professionals.https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/60989social welfareevaluationdata modelclient documentstandardised documentation
spellingShingle Erja Ailio
Niina Häkälä
Jarmo Kärki
Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
social welfare
evaluation
data model
client document
standardised documentation
title Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
title_full Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
title_fullStr Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
title_full_unstemmed Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
title_short Sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
title_sort sosiaalihuollon asiakasasiakirjarakenteiden katselmointi
topic social welfare
evaluation
data model
client document
standardised documentation
url https://journal.fi/finjehew/article/view/60989
work_keys_str_mv AT erjaailio sosiaalihuollonasiakasasiakirjarakenteidenkatselmointi
AT niinahakala sosiaalihuollonasiakasasiakirjarakenteidenkatselmointi
AT jarmokarki sosiaalihuollonasiakasasiakirjarakenteidenkatselmointi