CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL.
The judicial control on bail is one of the five preventive measures provided by the New Criminal Procedure Code. The faulty way of regulating the preventive measure of judicial control on bail has determined an extremely low applicability of this preventive measure in the judicial practice of our...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2018-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_014.pdf |
| _version_ | 1826907074283438080 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrei-Viorel IUGAN |
| author_facet | Andrei-Viorel IUGAN |
| author_sort | Andrei-Viorel IUGAN |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The judicial control on bail is one of the five preventive measures provided by the New Criminal Procedure Code.
The faulty way of regulating the preventive measure of judicial control on bail has determined an extremely low applicability
of this preventive measure in the judicial practice of our country.
Both in doctrine and jurisprudence there is controversy over the procedure to be followed in orderto take the measure
of judicial control on bail. In a doctrinal opinion it was shown that there is a preliminary stage of admissibility in principle
and that the provisions of art. 242 C.P.P. shall be applied by analogy. This is one of the problems we intend to analyze in our
study.
In the Western countries legislation, such a measure is widespread, being considered a viable alternative to the
deprivation of liberty. The threat of losing a very large amount of money will obviously cause the defendant to weigh heavily
the way he respects the obligations imposed by the judicial bodies.
The jurisprudential controversies previously described with regards taking this measure, controversies born from
the very wording used by the legislator, prompted many prosecutors to be reluctant to order / take such a measure.
We hope that in the future, the regulation of judicial control will be given greater attention and this preventive
measure will truly become a genuine alternative to custodial preventive measures. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T15:10:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fff8fd751a324f6292b737110529f4a9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2068-7796 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-17T08:58:43Z |
| publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-fff8fd751a324f6292b737110529f4a92025-01-02T17:50:16ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962068-77962018-05-0112-101106CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL.Andrei-Viorel IUGAN0Assistant Professor, PhD, Faculty of Law, “Nicolae Titulescu” University, Bucharest (e-mail: andyiugan@yahoo.com)The judicial control on bail is one of the five preventive measures provided by the New Criminal Procedure Code. The faulty way of regulating the preventive measure of judicial control on bail has determined an extremely low applicability of this preventive measure in the judicial practice of our country. Both in doctrine and jurisprudence there is controversy over the procedure to be followed in orderto take the measure of judicial control on bail. In a doctrinal opinion it was shown that there is a preliminary stage of admissibility in principle and that the provisions of art. 242 C.P.P. shall be applied by analogy. This is one of the problems we intend to analyze in our study. In the Western countries legislation, such a measure is widespread, being considered a viable alternative to the deprivation of liberty. The threat of losing a very large amount of money will obviously cause the defendant to weigh heavily the way he respects the obligations imposed by the judicial bodies. The jurisprudential controversies previously described with regards taking this measure, controversies born from the very wording used by the legislator, prompted many prosecutors to be reluctant to order / take such a measure. We hope that in the future, the regulation of judicial control will be given greater attention and this preventive measure will truly become a genuine alternative to custodial preventive measures.http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_014.pdfpreventive measuresbailjudicial controlprosecutorcourt |
| spellingShingle | Andrei-Viorel IUGAN CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. Challenges of the Knowledge Society preventive measures bail judicial control prosecutor court |
| title | CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. |
| title_full | CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. |
| title_fullStr | CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. |
| title_full_unstemmed | CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. |
| title_short | CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PREVENTIVE MEASURE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL ON BAIL. |
| title_sort | considerations regarding the preventive measure of judicial control on bail |
| topic | preventive measures bail judicial control prosecutor court |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_014.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreivioreliugan considerationsregardingthepreventivemeasureofjudicialcontrolonbail |