A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak

This paper explores the history of age detection of trees, especially the age history of oak trees, throughout two centuries in Estonia. It was already in the beginning of the 19th century when relations between the size and age of oaks in northern Latvia (previous Livonian province) were described....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sander Heldur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-09-01
Series:Metsanduslikud Uurimused
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0002
_version_ 1818745248676839424
author Sander Heldur
author_facet Sander Heldur
author_sort Sander Heldur
collection DOAJ
description This paper explores the history of age detection of trees, especially the age history of oak trees, throughout two centuries in Estonia. It was already in the beginning of the 19th century when relations between the size and age of oaks in northern Latvia (previous Livonian province) were described. The paper explains how the species concept of Quercus robur developed over time in the past and points out discussions on the existence of two varieties Q. robur L. var. tardiflora Czern and Q. robur L. var. praecox Czern. It also states that thanks to the use of the increment borer, the first dendrochronological studies were carried out in Estonia in the 1920s. Dendrochronological research in the Soviet Union began in the 1950s with Lithuania being the leading country in the field headed by Teodaras Bitvinskas. In Estonia, research was continued in the 1960s until now. The paper takes a look at the life of Mart Rohtla who introduced the method of determining tree age according to tree bark, presents his standpoints on oaks and critically assesses these. A comparative assessment is given on the ages of oak and lime trees found according to the tree-ring method and bark increment method. The great ages of the oaks and limes found by applying the bark increments method are doubted and considered unreliable. However, the age of the surface layers of the bark of oaks and limes needs clarification in the future.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T02:57:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fffbd05d4d574e8e8adf92633c512ec6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1736-8723
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T02:57:11Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Metsanduslikud Uurimused
spelling doaj.art-fffbd05d4d574e8e8adf92633c512ec62022-12-21T21:23:21ZengSciendoMetsanduslikud Uurimused1736-87232020-09-0172132010.2478/fsmu-2020-0002A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oakSander Heldur0Retired scientist, MSc in geoecology, Mahtra 9–121, Tallinn, Estonia; tel. + 372 53340399This paper explores the history of age detection of trees, especially the age history of oak trees, throughout two centuries in Estonia. It was already in the beginning of the 19th century when relations between the size and age of oaks in northern Latvia (previous Livonian province) were described. The paper explains how the species concept of Quercus robur developed over time in the past and points out discussions on the existence of two varieties Q. robur L. var. tardiflora Czern and Q. robur L. var. praecox Czern. It also states that thanks to the use of the increment borer, the first dendrochronological studies were carried out in Estonia in the 1920s. Dendrochronological research in the Soviet Union began in the 1950s with Lithuania being the leading country in the field headed by Teodaras Bitvinskas. In Estonia, research was continued in the 1960s until now. The paper takes a look at the life of Mart Rohtla who introduced the method of determining tree age according to tree bark, presents his standpoints on oaks and critically assesses these. A comparative assessment is given on the ages of oak and lime trees found according to the tree-ring method and bark increment method. The great ages of the oaks and limes found by applying the bark increments method are doubted and considered unreliable. However, the age of the surface layers of the bark of oaks and limes needs clarification in the future.https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0002dendrochronologymart rohtlacrop of treesquercus roburtilia sp.
spellingShingle Sander Heldur
A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
Metsanduslikud Uurimused
dendrochronology
mart rohtla
crop of trees
quercus robur
tilia sp.
title A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
title_full A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
title_fullStr A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
title_full_unstemmed A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
title_short A history of varying methods for determining tree age in Estonia with emphasis on oak
title_sort history of varying methods for determining tree age in estonia with emphasis on oak
topic dendrochronology
mart rohtla
crop of trees
quercus robur
tilia sp.
url https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0002
work_keys_str_mv AT sanderheldur ahistoryofvaryingmethodsfordeterminingtreeageinestoniawithemphasisonoak
AT sanderheldur historyofvaryingmethodsfordeterminingtreeageinestoniawithemphasisonoak