Topological Constraints in Directed Polymer Melts

Polymers in a melt may be subject to topological constraints, as in the example of unlinked polymer rings. How to do statistical mechanics in the presence of such constraints remains a fundamental open problem. We study the effect of topological constraints on a melt of directed polymers, using simu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serna, Pablo, Bunin, Guy, Nahum, Adam
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100232
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-4532
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3074-4217
Description
Summary:Polymers in a melt may be subject to topological constraints, as in the example of unlinked polymer rings. How to do statistical mechanics in the presence of such constraints remains a fundamental open problem. We study the effect of topological constraints on a melt of directed polymers, using simulations of a simple quasi-2D model. We find that fixing the global topology of the melt to be trivial changes the polymer conformations drastically. Polymers of length L wander in the transverse direction only by a distance of order (lnL)[superscript ζ] with ζ≃1.5. This is strongly suppressed in comparison with the Brownian L[superscript 1/2] scaling which holds in the absence of the topological constraint. It is also much smaller than the predictions of standard heuristic approaches—in particular the L[superscript 1/4] of a mean-field-like “array of obstacles” model—so our results present a sharp challenge to theory. Dynamics are also strongly affected by the constraints, and a tagged monomer in an infinite system performs logarithmically slow subdiffusion in the transverse direction. To cast light on the suppression of the strands’ wandering, we analyze the topological complexity of subregions of the melt: the complexity is also logarithmically small, and is related to the wandering by a power law. We comment on insights the results give for 3D melts, directed and nondirected.