Longitudinal spread of mechanical excitation through tectorial membrane traveling waves

The mammalian inner ear separates sounds by their frequency content, and this separation underlies important properties of human hearing, including our ability to understand speech in noisy environments. Studies of genetic disorders of hearing have demonstrated a link between frequency selectivity a...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Farrahi, Shirin, Ghaffari, Roozbeh, Freeman, Dennis M., Sellon, Jonathan Blake
其他作者: Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
格式: 文件
语言:en_US
出版: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2016
在线阅读:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102391
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0622-1333
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6309-0910
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-5067
实物特征
总结:The mammalian inner ear separates sounds by their frequency content, and this separation underlies important properties of human hearing, including our ability to understand speech in noisy environments. Studies of genetic disorders of hearing have demonstrated a link between frequency selectivity and wave properties of the tectorial membrane (TM). To understand these wave properties better, we developed chemical manipulations that systematically and reversibly alter TM stiffness and viscosity. Using microfabricated shear probes, we show that (i) reducing pH reduces TM stiffness with little change in TM viscosity and (ii) adding PEG increases TM viscosity with little change in TM stiffness. By applying these manipulations in measurements of TM waves, we show that TM wave speed is determined primarily by stiffness at low frequencies and by viscosity at high frequencies. Both TM viscosity and stiffness affect the longitudinal spread of mechanical excitation through the TM over a broad range of frequencies. Increasing TM viscosity or decreasing stiffness reduces longitudinal spread of mechanical excitation, thereby coupling a smaller range of best frequencies and sharpening tuning. In contrast, increasing viscous loss or decreasing stiffness would tend to broaden tuning in resonance-based TM models. Thus, TM wave and resonance mechanisms are fundamentally different in the way they control frequency selectivity.