Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension

Although sentences are thought to be generally easier to process when given information precedes new information, closer examination reveals that these preferences only manifest within some syntactic structures. Here, we examine the consequences of the relative ordering of given and new information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown, Meredith, Savova, Virginia, Gibson, Edward A.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Elsevier 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102464
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
_version_ 1826208473906413568
author Brown, Meredith
Savova, Virginia
Gibson, Edward A.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Brown, Meredith
Savova, Virginia
Gibson, Edward A.
author_sort Brown, Meredith
collection MIT
description Although sentences are thought to be generally easier to process when given information precedes new information, closer examination reveals that these preferences only manifest within some syntactic structures. Here, we examine the consequences of the relative ordering of given and new information (information structure) for the on-line comprehension of prepositional-object (PO) and double-object (DO) dative sentences. Experiment 1 demonstrated using self-paced reading that the on-line comprehension of DO structures, but not PO structures, is more difficult with new-before-given information structure. Experiment 2 assessed the comprehension of dative sentences with animate themes to evaluate two potential sources of this interaction: information-structural constraints encoded within syntactic representations (argument structure hypothesis) vs. word-to-word contingency statistics (linear position hypothesis). Despite experiment-wise differences in word-to-word contingency statistics, the interaction between syntactic structure and information structure persisted in Experiment 2. Taken together, these results suggest that syntactic representations can include information-structural constraints on their arguments.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:06:14Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/102464
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:06:14Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1024642022-09-28T18:29:48Z Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension Brown, Meredith Savova, Virginia Gibson, Edward A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Gibson, Edward A. Savova, Virginia Gibson, Edward A. Although sentences are thought to be generally easier to process when given information precedes new information, closer examination reveals that these preferences only manifest within some syntactic structures. Here, we examine the consequences of the relative ordering of given and new information (information structure) for the on-line comprehension of prepositional-object (PO) and double-object (DO) dative sentences. Experiment 1 demonstrated using self-paced reading that the on-line comprehension of DO structures, but not PO structures, is more difficult with new-before-given information structure. Experiment 2 assessed the comprehension of dative sentences with animate themes to evaluate two potential sources of this interaction: information-structural constraints encoded within syntactic representations (argument structure hypothesis) vs. word-to-word contingency statistics (linear position hypothesis). Despite experiment-wise differences in word-to-word contingency statistics, the interaction between syntactic structure and information structure persisted in Experiment 2. Taken together, these results suggest that syntactic representations can include information-structural constraints on their arguments. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (Grant N00014-07-1-0937) United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Grant NBCH-D-03-0010) 2016-05-12T13:45:55Z 2016-05-12T13:45:55Z 2011-09 2011-08 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0749596X 1096-0821 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102464 Brown, Meredith, Virginia Savova, and Edward Gibson. “Syntax Encodes Information Structure: Evidence from on-Line Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 66, no. 1 (January 2012): 194–209. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.006 Journal of Memory and Language Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier Prof. Gibson
spellingShingle Brown, Meredith
Savova, Virginia
Gibson, Edward A.
Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title_full Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title_fullStr Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title_full_unstemmed Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title_short Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension
title_sort syntax encodes information structure evidence from on line reading comprehension
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102464
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmeredith syntaxencodesinformationstructureevidencefromonlinereadingcomprehension
AT savovavirginia syntaxencodesinformationstructureevidencefromonlinereadingcomprehension
AT gibsonedwarda syntaxencodesinformationstructureevidencefromonlinereadingcomprehension