Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster

An empirical study of scientific communication among biotechnology companies supports the belief that geographic clustering does produce increased scientific exchange among companies. A comparison of companies within a constrained geographic area with those more dispersed shows a significantly highe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allen, Thomas J., Raz, Ornit, Gloor, Peter A.
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102835
_version_ 1826196634903511040
author Allen, Thomas J.
Raz, Ornit
Gloor, Peter A.
author_facet Allen, Thomas J.
Raz, Ornit
Gloor, Peter A.
author_sort Allen, Thomas J.
collection MIT
description An empirical study of scientific communication among biotechnology companies supports the belief that geographic clustering does produce increased scientific exchange among companies. A comparison of companies within a constrained geographic area with those more dispersed shows a significantly higher level of scientific communication among the former. Scientific communication declines rapidly with plupical separation. Critical of the formation of cluster – based scientific communication networks is the presence of both universities and large firms from the same industry.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:31:38Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/102835
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:31:38Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1028352019-04-10T16:35:48Z Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster Allen, Thomas J. Raz, Ornit Gloor, Peter A. An empirical study of scientific communication among biotechnology companies supports the belief that geographic clustering does produce increased scientific exchange among companies. A comparison of companies within a constrained geographic area with those more dispersed shows a significantly higher level of scientific communication among the former. Scientific communication declines rapidly with plupical separation. Critical of the formation of cluster – based scientific communication networks is the presence of both universities and large firms from the same industry. 2016-06-02T15:16:34Z 2016-06-02T15:16:34Z 2009-04 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102835 en_US ESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2009-01 application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
spellingShingle Allen, Thomas J.
Raz, Ornit
Gloor, Peter A.
Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title_full Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title_fullStr Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title_full_unstemmed Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title_short Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster
title_sort does geographic clustering still benefit high tech new ventures the case of the cambridge boston biotech cluster
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102835
work_keys_str_mv AT allenthomasj doesgeographicclusteringstillbenefithightechnewventuresthecaseofthecambridgebostonbiotechcluster
AT razornit doesgeographicclusteringstillbenefithightechnewventuresthecaseofthecambridgebostonbiotechcluster
AT gloorpetera doesgeographicclusteringstillbenefithightechnewventuresthecaseofthecambridgebostonbiotechcluster